azanganeh .com

3.64

Results collected 2024-04-05 from https://azanganeh.com/

Lighthouse Performance

2.85

The website is quite slow.
Total Blocking Time: 120 ms 4.85
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.2 s 1.00
Cumulative Layout Shift 5.00
First Contentful Paint: 5.6 s 1.00
Speed Index: 9.5 s 1.00
Eliminate render-blocking resources 1.00
Enable text compression 1.00
First Meaningful Paint: 6.1 s 1.00
Largest Contentful Paint element 1.00
Minify CSS 1.00
Preconnect to required origins 1.00
Reduce initial server response time 1.00
Reduce unused CSS 1.00
Reduce unused JavaScript 1.00
Time to Interactive: 12.0 s 1.00
Use HTTP/2 1.00
Defer offscreen images: Potential savings of 1,007 KiB 2.50
Ensure text remains visible during webfont load: 2.50
Image elements do not have explicit width and height: 2.50
Minify JavaScript: Potential savings of 64 KiB 2.50
Serve images in next-gen formats: Potential savings of 916 KiB 2.50
Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy: 16 resources found 2.50
Max Potential First Input Delay: 150 ms 4.15
Avoid chaining critical requests 5.00
Avoid large layout shifts 5.00
Avoid large layout shifts 5.00
Avoid long main-thread tasks 5.00
Avoid multiple page redirects 5.00
Avoid serving legacy JavaScript to modern browsers 5.00
Avoids document.write() 5.00
Avoids an excessive DOM size 5.00
Avoids enormous network payloads 5.00
Diagnostics 5.00
Efficiently encode images 5.00
Final Screenshot 5.00
Has a <meta name="viewport"> tag with width or initial-scale 5.00
JavaScript execution time 5.00
Metrics 5.00
Minimize third-party usage 5.00
Minimizes main-thread work 5.00
Network Requests 5.00
Network Round Trip Times 5.00
Properly size images 5.00
Remove duplicate modules in JavaScript bundles 5.00
Resources Summary 5.00
Screenshot Thumbnails 5.00
Script Treemap Data 5.00
Server Backend Latencies 5.00
Tasks 5.00
Use video formats for animated content 5.00
Uses passive listeners to improve scrolling performance 5.00
Enable text compression 1.00

Lighthouse SEO

4.15

Pretty good at SEO, but still has some potential improvements.
Document does not have a meta description 1.00
Links do not have descriptive text 1.00
Tap targets are not sized appropriately: 88% appropriately sized tap targets 3.95
Document avoids plugins 5.00
Document has a <title> element 5.00
Document has a valid hreflang 5.00
Document uses legible font sizes 5.00
Has a <meta name="viewport"> tag with width or initial-scale 5.00
Image elements have [alt] attributes 5.00
Links are crawlable 5.00
Page has successful HTTP status code 5.00
Page isn’t blocked from indexing 5.00
robots.txt is valid 5.00

Lighthouse Best Practices

5.00

The website is adhering to good practice according to Google Lighthouse!
Avoids deprecated APIs 5.00
Avoids third-party cookies 5.00
Uses HTTPS 5.00
Allows users to paste into input fields 5.00
Avoids unload event listeners 5.00
Avoids requesting the geolocation permission on page load 5.00
Avoids requesting the notification permission on page load 5.00
Displays images with correct aspect ratio 5.00
No browser errors logged to the console 5.00
No issues in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools 5.00
Page has the HTML doctype 5.00
Properly defines charset 5.00
Serves images with appropriate resolution 5.00
Detected JavaScript libraries 5.00
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks 5.00
Page has valid source maps 5.00
Uses HTTPS 5.00
No issues in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools 5.00
Allows users to paste into input fields 5.00
Avoids deprecated APIs 5.00
Page has the HTML doctype 5.00

W3C HTML

4.80

The tested page has 2 errors in its HTML code.
Number of grouped error type: 1 4.80
Number of errors: 2 4.80
Attribute X not allowed on element X at this point. (errors of this type: 2 pcs)

Standard Files

4.00

robots.txt seems ok. 5.00
Sitemap seems to work. 5.00
RSS subscription found. 5.00
security.txt is missing. 1.00

Lighthouse A11y

4.75

The website can be more accessible, but is rather good!
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio. 1.00
Image elements have [alt] attributes 5.00
[aria-*] attributes are valid and not misspelled 5.00
[aria-*] attributes have valid values 5.00
[aria-*] attributes match their roles 5.00
[aria-hidden="true"] is not present on the document <body> 5.00
[role]s have all required [aria-*] attributes 5.00
[user-scalable="no"] is not used in the <meta name="viewport"> element and the [maximum-scale] attribute is not less than 5. 5.00
Document has a <title> element 5.00
Links are distinguishable without relying on color. 5.00
Links have a discernible name 5.00
List items (<li>) are contained within <ul>, <ol> or <menu> parent elements 5.00
Lists contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>). 5.00
<html> element has a [lang] attribute 5.00
<html> element has a valid value for its [lang] attribute 5.00
[role] values are valid 5.00
Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order 5.00
Skip links are focusable. 5.00
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes that are redundant text. 5.00
Values assigned to role="" are valid ARIA roles. 5.00
Identical links have the same purpose. 5.00

Sitespeed.io

3.59

About average speed. 3.59
Speedindex: 1910 3.59
Loading time: 2.67s
Number of requests: 31

Yellow Lab Tools

3.90

The website is neither good nor bad. 3.90
Page weight 1.75
Requests 4.75
DOM complexity 5.00
JS complexity 5.00
Bad JS 5.00
jQuery 5.00
CSS complexity 2.45
Bad CSS 2.75
Web fonts 3.15
Server config 3.85
Number of iframes 5.00
Total JS execution time 5.00
DOM access 5.00
Scroll events bound 5.00
document.write calls 5.00
Synchronous Ajax requests 5.00
Rules count 3.75
Total weight 3.50
Image optimization 1.05
Oversized images 5.00
Gzip/Brotli compression 1.00
File minification 1.85
Requests number 5.00
Different domains 5.00
404 not found 5.00
Connections closed 5.00
Identical content 5.00
Below the fold images 3.20
Webfonts number 1.25
Overweighted webfonts 5.00
WOFF 2 5.00
HTTP protocols 2.60
TLS protocols 4.00
Caching disabled 5.00
Caching not specified 1.65
Caching too short 5.00
jQuery version 5.00
TLS protocols 4.00
IDs duplicated 5.00
CSS syntax error 2.50
Gzip/Brotli compression 1.00
404 not found 5.00
TLS protocols 4.00

Pa11y

2.40

The accessibility is apparently really bad! Probably both for disabled people and everyone of us when we need some accessibility!
Number of error type: 6 3.80
Number of errors: 104 1.00

Problems:

A element has insufficient contrast at this conformance level. Expected a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, but text in this element has a contrast ratio of 2.77:1. Recommendation: change text colour to #0e72b5.
A element has insufficient contrast at this conformance level. Expected a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, but text in this element has a contrast ratio of 2.32:1. Recommendation: change text colour to #767676.
A element has insufficient contrast at this conformance level. Expected a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, but text in this element has a contrast ratio of 1.86:1. Recommendation: change text colour to #686e73.
A element has insufficient contrast at this conformance level. Expected a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, but text in this element has a contrast ratio of 2.12:1. Recommendation: change text colour to #71777c.
A element has insufficient contrast at this conformance level. Expected a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, but text in this element has a contrast ratio of 3.15:1. Recommendation: change text colour to #177bbe.
Img element is the only content of the link, but is missing alt text. The alt text should describe the purpose of the link.

Integrity & Security

2.44

Rather poor on user privacy.
Result generated: 2024-04-05 08:35:57 Etc/UTC (Cached for 24 hours)
HTTPS by default: is good! 5.00
Strict Transport Security: is pretty bad. 1.00
Content Security Policy: is pretty bad. 1.00
Reporting CSP Certificate Transparency Network Error Logging: is good! 5.00
Referrer Policy: is pretty bad. 1.00
Subresource Integrity SRI: is pretty bad. 1.00
HTTP headers: is ok, with 1 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 4.50
Cookies: is ok, with 12 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 1.00

HTTP & Tech

3.22

HTTP to HTTPS redirect 5.00
No TLSv1.3 support 1.00
TLSv1.2 support 5.00
No IPv6 support 1.00
IPv4 support 5.00
No HTTPv3 support 1.00
No QUIC support 1.00

Carbon Calculator

2.55

Average regarding carbon dioxide.
Carbon dioxide per pageview: 1.21 gram(s)
More green than 51 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2022-12-16).
More green than 52 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2021-12-12).
Network transfer size: 2 mb 2.55