cdisol .blog
3.83
Results from https://www.cdisol.blog/
Lighthouse Performance
3.70
Results collected at 2024-12-02
- About average speed.
Performance section:
- Total Blocking Time: 120 ms 4.85
- Largest Contentful Paint: 4.6 s 1.75
- Cumulative Layout Shift 5.00
- Speed Index: 5.8 s 2.50
- First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s 3.15
- Reduce initial server response time 1.00
- Largest Contentful Paint element 1.00
- Eliminate render-blocking resources 1.00
- Reduce unused CSS 1.00
- Time to Interactive: 8.7 s 1.80
- Preload Largest Contentful Paint image: 2.50
- Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy: 25 resources found 2.50
- Defer offscreen images: Potential savings of 58 KiB 2.50
- Minify CSS: Potential savings of 4 KiB 2.50
- Minify JavaScript: Potential savings of 13 KiB 2.50
- Reduce unused JavaScript: Potential savings of 177 KiB 2.50
- Properly size images: Potential savings of 30 KiB 2.50
- Max Potential First Input Delay: 130 ms 4.50
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- Screenshot Thumbnails 5.00
- Final Screenshot 5.00
- User Timing marks and measures 5.00
- Avoid chaining critical requests 5.00
- Avoid multiple page redirects 5.00
- Minimizes main-thread work 5.00
- JavaScript execution time 5.00
- Preconnect to required origins 5.00
- All text remains visible during webfont loads 5.00
- Diagnostics 5.00
- Network Requests 5.00
- Network Round Trip Times 5.00
- Server Backend Latencies 5.00
- Tasks 5.00
- Metrics 5.00
- Resources Summary 5.00
- Minimize third-party usage 5.00
- Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded 5.00
- Avoid large layout shifts 5.00
- Avoid long main-thread tasks 5.00
- Avoid non-composited animations 5.00
- Image elements have explicit `width` and `height` 5.00
- Script Treemap Data 5.00
- Avoids enormous network payloads 5.00
- Serve images in next-gen formats 5.00
- Efficiently encode images 5.00
- Enable text compression 5.00
- Use video formats for animated content 5.00
- Remove duplicate modules in JavaScript bundles 5.00
- Avoid serving legacy JavaScript to modern browsers 5.00
- Avoids an excessive DOM size 5.00
- Avoids `document.write()` 5.00
- Use HTTP/2 5.00
- Uses passive listeners to improve scrolling performance 5.00
- Page didn't prevent back/forward cache restoration 5.00
Performance section:
- Total Blocking Time: 120 ms 4.85
- Largest Contentful Paint: 4.6 s 1.75
- Cumulative Layout Shift 5.00
- Speed Index: 5.8 s 2.50
- First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s 3.15
- Reduce initial server response time 1.00
- Largest Contentful Paint element 1.00
- Eliminate render-blocking resources 1.00
- Reduce unused CSS 1.00
- Time to Interactive: 8.7 s 1.80
- Preload Largest Contentful Paint image: 2.50
- Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy: 25 resources found 2.50
- Defer offscreen images: Potential savings of 58 KiB 2.50
- Minify CSS: Potential savings of 4 KiB 2.50
- Minify JavaScript: Potential savings of 13 KiB 2.50
- Reduce unused JavaScript: Potential savings of 177 KiB 2.50
- Properly size images: Potential savings of 30 KiB 2.50
- Max Potential First Input Delay: 130 ms 4.50
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- Screenshot Thumbnails 5.00
- Final Screenshot 5.00
- User Timing marks and measures 5.00
- Avoid chaining critical requests 5.00
- Avoid multiple page redirects 5.00
- Minimizes main-thread work 5.00
- JavaScript execution time 5.00
- Preconnect to required origins 5.00
- All text remains visible during webfont loads 5.00
- Diagnostics 5.00
- Network Requests 5.00
- Network Round Trip Times 5.00
- Server Backend Latencies 5.00
- Tasks 5.00
- Metrics 5.00
- Resources Summary 5.00
- Minimize third-party usage 5.00
- Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded 5.00
- Avoid large layout shifts 5.00
- Avoid long main-thread tasks 5.00
- Avoid non-composited animations 5.00
- Image elements have explicit `width` and `height` 5.00
- Script Treemap Data 5.00
- Avoids enormous network payloads 5.00
- Serve images in next-gen formats 5.00
- Efficiently encode images 5.00
- Enable text compression 5.00
- Use video formats for animated content 5.00
- Remove duplicate modules in JavaScript bundles 5.00
- Avoid serving legacy JavaScript to modern browsers 5.00
- Avoids an excessive DOM size 5.00
- Avoids `document.write()` 5.00
- Use HTTP/2 5.00
- Uses passive listeners to improve scrolling performance 5.00
- Page didn't prevent back/forward cache restoration 5.00
404 Page
5.00
Results collected at 2024-12-02
- Correct status code? Got 404, and 404 is correct. 5.00
- Found a page title in the page's metadata? 5.00
- Found headline (h1)? 5.00
- Is it lacking text describing that an error has occurred (in Swedish OR English for English sites)? 5.00
- Is text content length is less than 150 characters, which indicates that the user is not being referred, nor advised? 5.00
- Found a page title in the page's metadata? 5.00
- Found headline (h1)? 5.00
- Is it lacking text describing that an error has occurred (in Swedish OR English for English sites)? 5.00
- Is text content length is less than 150 characters, which indicates that the user is not being referred, nor advised? 5.00
Lighthouse SEO
4.25
Results collected at 2024-12-02
- Pretty good at SEO, but still has some potential improvements.
- Document does not have a meta description 1.00
- Links do not have descriptive text 1.00
- Page isn’t blocked from indexing 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- Image elements have `[alt]` attributes 5.00
- Page has successful HTTP status code 5.00
- Links are crawlable 5.00
- robots.txt is valid 5.00
- Document has a valid `hreflang` 5.00
- Document has a valid `rel=canonical` 5.00
- Document does not have a meta description 1.00
- Links do not have descriptive text 1.00
- Page isn’t blocked from indexing 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- Image elements have `[alt]` attributes 5.00
- Page has successful HTTP status code 5.00
- Links are crawlable 5.00
- robots.txt is valid 5.00
- Document has a valid `hreflang` 5.00
- Document has a valid `rel=canonical` 5.00
Lighthouse Best Practices
4.80
Results collected at 2024-12-02
- The website can still make some improvements on best practices.
- Uses HTTPS 5.00
- Avoids deprecated APIs 5.00
- Avoids third-party cookies 5.00
- Issues were logged in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools 1.00
- Allows users to paste into input fields 5.00
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- No browser errors logged to the console 5.00
- Displays images with correct aspect ratio 5.00
- Serves images with appropriate resolution 5.00
- Page has the HTML doctype 5.00
- Properly defines charset 5.00
- Avoids requesting the geolocation permission on page load 5.00
- Avoids requesting the notification permission on page load 5.00
- Document uses legible font sizes 5.00
- Page has valid source maps 5.00
- Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks 5.00
- Detected JavaScript libraries 5.00
- Uses HTTPS 5.00
- Avoids deprecated APIs 5.00
- Avoids third-party cookies 5.00
- Issues were logged in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools 1.00
- Allows users to paste into input fields 5.00
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- No browser errors logged to the console 5.00
- Displays images with correct aspect ratio 5.00
- Serves images with appropriate resolution 5.00
- Page has the HTML doctype 5.00
- Properly defines charset 5.00
- Avoids requesting the geolocation permission on page load 5.00
- Avoids requesting the notification permission on page load 5.00
- Document uses legible font sizes 5.00
- Page has valid source maps 5.00
- Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks 5.00
- Detected JavaScript libraries 5.00
W3C HTML
4.30
Results collected at 2024-12-02
- The tested page has 51 errors in its HTML code.
Standards section:
- #1: Webpage - Number of grouped error type: 8 3.40
- #1: Webpage - Number of errors: 46 1.00
- End tag “div” seen, but there were open elements. (errors of this type: 10 pcs)
- Unclosed element “span”. (errors of this type: 10 pcs)
- Stray end tag “span”. (errors of this type: 10 pcs)
- The text content of element “time” was not in the required format: The literal did not satisfy the time-datetime format. (errors of this type: 10 pcs)
- A “meta” element with an “http-equiv” attribute whose value is “X-UA-Compatible” must have a “content” attribute with the value “IE=edge”. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- Bad value “auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px” for attribute “sizes” on element “img”: Bad CSS number token: Expected a minus sign or a digit but saw “a” instead at “auto,”. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- Bad value “auto, (max-width: 1920px) 100vw, 1920px” for attribute “sizes” on element “img”: Bad CSS number token: Expected a minus sign or a digit but saw “a” instead at “auto,”. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- End tag for “body” seen, but there were unclosed elements. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- Unclosed element “div”. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- The “aria-controls” attribute must point to an element in the same document. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- #53: zrt-lookup.html- Number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- #53: zrt-lookup.html- Number of errors: 0 5.00
- #54: ads- Number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- #54: ads- Number of errors: 0 5.00
- #58: runner.html- Number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- #58: runner.html- Number of errors: 0 5.00
Standards section:
- #1: Webpage - Number of grouped error type: 8 3.40
- #1: Webpage - Number of errors: 46 1.00
- End tag “div” seen, but there were open elements. (errors of this type: 10 pcs)
- Unclosed element “span”. (errors of this type: 10 pcs)
- Stray end tag “span”. (errors of this type: 10 pcs)
- The text content of element “time” was not in the required format: The literal did not satisfy the time-datetime format. (errors of this type: 10 pcs)
- A “meta” element with an “http-equiv” attribute whose value is “X-UA-Compatible” must have a “content” attribute with the value “IE=edge”. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- Bad value “auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px” for attribute “sizes” on element “img”: Bad CSS number token: Expected a minus sign or a digit but saw “a” instead at “auto,”. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- Bad value “auto, (max-width: 1920px) 100vw, 1920px” for attribute “sizes” on element “img”: Bad CSS number token: Expected a minus sign or a digit but saw “a” instead at “auto,”. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- End tag for “body” seen, but there were unclosed elements. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- Unclosed element “div”. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- The “aria-controls” attribute must point to an element in the same document. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- #53: zrt-lookup.html- Number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- #53: zrt-lookup.html- Number of errors: 0 5.00
- #54: ads- Number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- #54: ads- Number of errors: 0 5.00
- #58: runner.html- Number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- #58: runner.html- Number of errors: 0 5.00
W3C CSS
4.59
Results collected at 2024-12-02
- The CSS is good.
Standards section:
- `<style>` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 1 4.80
- `<style>` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 1 4.90
- CSS: “contain-intrinsic-size”: Property “contain-intrinsic-size” doesn't exist. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- `style=""` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `style=""` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 0 5.00
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 6 3.80
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 14 3.60
- CSS: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 5)
- CSS: “rotate”: Property “rotate” doesn't exist. (number of errors of this type: 3)
- CSS: “scrollbar-gutter”: Property “scrollbar-gutter” doesn't exist. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “right”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “top”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “padding”: The types are incompatible. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “margin-bottom”: Too many values or values are not recognized. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “cursor”: “hand” is not a “cursor” value. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- `style=""` in: #54: ads, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `style=""` in: #54: ads, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #45: m-el-main-css, number of grouped error type: 2 4.60
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #45: m-el-main-css, number of errors: 8 4.20
- CSS: “background-image”: The first argument to the “linear-gradient” function should be “to top”, not “top”. (number of errors of this type: 6)
- CSS: “display”: “auto” is not a “display” value. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “background”: The first argument to the “linear-gradient” function should be “to top”, not “top”. (number of errors of this type: 1)
Standards section:
- `<style>` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 1 4.80
- `<style>` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 1 4.90
- CSS: “contain-intrinsic-size”: Property “contain-intrinsic-size” doesn't exist. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- `style=""` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `style=""` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 0 5.00
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 6 3.80
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 14 3.60
- CSS: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 5)
- CSS: “rotate”: Property “rotate” doesn't exist. (number of errors of this type: 3)
- CSS: “scrollbar-gutter”: Property “scrollbar-gutter” doesn't exist. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “right”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “top”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “padding”: The types are incompatible. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “margin-bottom”: Too many values or values are not recognized. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “cursor”: “hand” is not a “cursor” value. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- `style=""` in: #54: ads, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `style=""` in: #54: ads, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #45: m-el-main-css, number of grouped error type: 2 4.60
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #45: m-el-main-css, number of errors: 8 4.20
- CSS: “background-image”: The first argument to the “linear-gradient” function should be “to top”, not “top”. (number of errors of this type: 6)
- CSS: “display”: “auto” is not a “display” value. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “background”: The first argument to the “linear-gradient” function should be “to top”, not “top”. (number of errors of this type: 1)
Standard Files
3.00
Results collected at 2024-12-02
- RSS subscription found in webpage metadata. 5.00
Standards section:
- robots.txt seems ok. 5.00
- Sitemap is not specified in robots.txt 1.00
- security.txt has incorrect content. 1.00
Standards section:
- robots.txt seems ok. 5.00
- Sitemap is not specified in robots.txt 1.00
- security.txt has incorrect content. 1.00
Lighthouse A11y
4.40
Results collected at 2024-12-02
- The website can be more accessible, but is rather good!
Accessibility section:
- Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio. 1.00
- Links do not have a discernible name 1.00
- Links rely on color to be distinguishable. 1.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes match their roles 5.00
- `[aria-hidden="true"]` is not present on the document `<body>` 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes have valid values 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes are valid and not misspelled 5.00
- Buttons have an accessible name 5.00
- Image elements have `[alt]` attributes 5.00
- `[user-scalable="no"]` is not used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element and the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is not less than 5. 5.00
- ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role 5.00
- Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- `<html>` element has a `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- `<html>` element has a valid value for its `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- Form elements have associated labels 5.00
- Lists contain only `<li>` elements and script supporting elements (`<script>` and `<template>`). 5.00
- List items (`<li>`) are contained within `<ul>`, `<ol>` or `<menu>` parent elements 5.00
- Select elements have associated label elements. 5.00
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing. 5.00
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order 5.00
- Skip links are focusable. 5.00
- Image elements do not have `[alt]` attributes that are redundant text. 5.00
- Identical links have the same purpose. 5.00
- Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names. 5.00
- Document has a main landmark. 5.00
Accessibility section:
- Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio. 1.00
- Links do not have a discernible name 1.00
- Links rely on color to be distinguishable. 1.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes match their roles 5.00
- `[aria-hidden="true"]` is not present on the document `<body>` 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes have valid values 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes are valid and not misspelled 5.00
- Buttons have an accessible name 5.00
- Image elements have `[alt]` attributes 5.00
- `[user-scalable="no"]` is not used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element and the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is not less than 5. 5.00
- ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role 5.00
- Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- `<html>` element has a `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- `<html>` element has a valid value for its `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- Form elements have associated labels 5.00
- Lists contain only `<li>` elements and script supporting elements (`<script>` and `<template>`). 5.00
- List items (`<li>`) are contained within `<ul>`, `<ol>` or `<menu>` parent elements 5.00
- Select elements have associated label elements. 5.00
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing. 5.00
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order 5.00
- Skip links are focusable. 5.00
- Image elements do not have `[alt]` attributes that are redundant text. 5.00
- Identical links have the same purpose. 5.00
- Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names. 5.00
- Document has a main landmark. 5.00
Sitespeed.io
4.25
Results collected at 2024-12-02
Performance section:
- [desktop] TTFB (Time to First Byte): 622.67ms, ±10.33ms 1.00
- [desktop] DOMContentLoaded: 1150.00ms, ±30.00ms 3.70
- [desktop] FCP (First Contentful Paint): 1076.67ms, ±23.33ms 5.00
- [desktop] LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): 1163.33ms, ±26.67ms 1.00
- [desktop] Load: 1420.00ms, ±20.00ms 3.16
- [desktop] TBT (Total Blocking Time): 19.00ms, ±5.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] FirstVisualChange: 1085.00ms, ±15.00ms 3.83
- [desktop] SpeedIndex: 1160.00ms, ±30.00ms 3.68
- [desktop] VisualComplete85: 1170.00ms, ±30.00ms 3.66
- [desktop] firstPaint: 1076.67ms, ±23.33ms
- [desktop] LastVisualChange: 1305.00ms, ±65.00ms
- [mobile] TTFB (Time to First Byte): 624.00ms, ±5.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] DOMContentLoaded: 1143.33ms, ±6.67ms 5.00
- [mobile] FCP (First Contentful Paint): 1056.67ms, ±3.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): 1146.67ms, ±3.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] Load: 1400.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] FirstVisualChange: 1070.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] SpeedIndex: 1150.00ms, ±10.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] VisualComplete85: 1150.00ms, ±20.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] TBT (Total Blocking Time): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] firstPaint: 1056.67ms, ±3.33ms
- [mobile] LastVisualChange: 1400.00ms, ±100.00ms
- [desktop] TTFB (Time to First Byte): 622.67ms, ±10.33ms 1.00
- [desktop] DOMContentLoaded: 1150.00ms, ±30.00ms 3.70
- [desktop] FCP (First Contentful Paint): 1076.67ms, ±23.33ms 5.00
- [desktop] LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): 1163.33ms, ±26.67ms 1.00
- [desktop] Load: 1420.00ms, ±20.00ms 3.16
- [desktop] TBT (Total Blocking Time): 19.00ms, ±5.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] FirstVisualChange: 1085.00ms, ±15.00ms 3.83
- [desktop] SpeedIndex: 1160.00ms, ±30.00ms 3.68
- [desktop] VisualComplete85: 1170.00ms, ±30.00ms 3.66
- [desktop] firstPaint: 1076.67ms, ±23.33ms
- [desktop] LastVisualChange: 1305.00ms, ±65.00ms
- [mobile] TTFB (Time to First Byte): 624.00ms, ±5.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] DOMContentLoaded: 1143.33ms, ±6.67ms 5.00
- [mobile] FCP (First Contentful Paint): 1056.67ms, ±3.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): 1146.67ms, ±3.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] Load: 1400.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] FirstVisualChange: 1070.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] SpeedIndex: 1150.00ms, ±10.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] VisualComplete85: 1150.00ms, ±20.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] TBT (Total Blocking Time): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] firstPaint: 1056.67ms, ±3.33ms
- [mobile] LastVisualChange: 1400.00ms, ±100.00ms
Yellow Lab Tools
4.15
Results collected at 2024-12-02
- The website has rather good frontend code. 4.15
- Network 4.75
- Images 3.45
- DOM complexity 5.00
- JS complexity 4.75
- Bad JS 4.90
- jQuery 5.00
- CSS complexity 1.05
- Bad CSS 3.20
- Web fonts 1.90
- Server config 5.00
Performance section:
- Number of iframes 5.00
- Total JS execution time 5.00
- DOM access 4.20
- Scroll events bound 5.00
- document.write calls 5.00
- Synchronous Ajax requests 5.00
- Rules count 1.00
- Total weight 5.00
- Gzip/Brotli compression 5.00
- File minification 2.65
- Requests number 5.00
- Different domains 4.70
- 404 not found 5.00
- Connections closed 5.00
- Identical content 5.00
- Below the fold images 4.10
- Webfonts number 1.25
- Overweighted webfonts 1.00
- WOFF 2 5.00
- HTTP protocols 5.00
- TLS protocols 5.00
- Caching disabled 5.00
- Caching not specified 5.00
- Caching too short 5.00
- Network 4.75
- Images 3.45
- DOM complexity 5.00
- JS complexity 4.75
- Bad JS 4.90
- jQuery 5.00
- CSS complexity 1.05
- Bad CSS 3.20
- Web fonts 1.90
- Server config 5.00
Performance section:
- Number of iframes 5.00
- Total JS execution time 5.00
- DOM access 4.20
- Scroll events bound 5.00
- document.write calls 5.00
- Synchronous Ajax requests 5.00
- Rules count 1.00
- Total weight 5.00
- Gzip/Brotli compression 5.00
- File minification 2.65
- Requests number 5.00
- Different domains 4.70
- 404 not found 5.00
- Connections closed 5.00
- Identical content 5.00
- Below the fold images 4.10
- Webfonts number 1.25
- Overweighted webfonts 1.00
- WOFF 2 5.00
- HTTP protocols 5.00
- TLS protocols 5.00
- Caching disabled 5.00
- Caching not specified 5.00
- Caching too short 5.00
Pa11y
1.80
Results collected at 2024-12-02
Accessibility section:
- Number of types of issues: 12 2.60
- Number of issues: 78 1.00
##### Problems:
- A element has insufficient contrast at this conformance level. Expected a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, but text in this element has a contrast ratio of 2.32:1. Recommendation: change text colour to #af6400.
- A element has insufficient contrast at this conformance level. Expected a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, but text in this element has a contrast ratio of 2.32:1. Recommendation: change background to #af6400.
- A link points to a named anchor "totop" within the document, but no anchor exists with that name.
- A searchinput element does not have a name available to an accessibility API. Valid names are: label element, title undefined, aria-label undefined, aria-labelledby undefined.
- A form field should be labelled in some way. Use the label element (either with a "for" attribute or wrapped around the form field), or "title", "aria-label" or "aria-labelledby" attributes as appropriate.
- Img element is the only content of the link, but is missing alt text. The alt text should describe the purpose of the link.
- A form does not contain a submit button, which creates issues for those who cannot submit the form using the keyboard. Submit buttons are INPUT elements with type attribute "submit" or "image", or BUTTON elements with type "submit" or omitted/invalid.
- A element has insufficient contrast at this conformance level. Expected a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, but text in this element has a contrast ratio of 3.32:1. Recommendation: change text colour to #70777d.
- A element has insufficient contrast at this conformance level. Expected a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, but text in this element has a contrast ratio of 3.34:1. Recommendation: change text colour to #fff.
- A textinput element does not have a name available to an accessibility API. Valid names are: label element, title undefined, aria-label undefined, aria-labelledby undefined.
- Info: Too many unique problems to list them all.
- Number of types of issues: 12 2.60
- Number of issues: 78 1.00
##### Problems:
- A element has insufficient contrast at this conformance level. Expected a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, but text in this element has a contrast ratio of 2.32:1. Recommendation: change text colour to #af6400.
- A element has insufficient contrast at this conformance level. Expected a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, but text in this element has a contrast ratio of 2.32:1. Recommendation: change background to #af6400.
- A link points to a named anchor "totop" within the document, but no anchor exists with that name.
- A searchinput element does not have a name available to an accessibility API. Valid names are: label element, title undefined, aria-label undefined, aria-labelledby undefined.
- A form field should be labelled in some way. Use the label element (either with a "for" attribute or wrapped around the form field), or "title", "aria-label" or "aria-labelledby" attributes as appropriate.
- Img element is the only content of the link, but is missing alt text. The alt text should describe the purpose of the link.
- A form does not contain a submit button, which creates issues for those who cannot submit the form using the keyboard. Submit buttons are INPUT elements with type attribute "submit" or "image", or BUTTON elements with type "submit" or omitted/invalid.
- A element has insufficient contrast at this conformance level. Expected a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, but text in this element has a contrast ratio of 3.32:1. Recommendation: change text colour to #70777d.
- A element has insufficient contrast at this conformance level. Expected a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, but text in this element has a contrast ratio of 3.34:1. Recommendation: change text colour to #fff.
- A textinput element does not have a name available to an accessibility API. Valid names are: label element, title undefined, aria-label undefined, aria-labelledby undefined.
- Info: Too many unique problems to list them all.
Integrity & Security
3.12
Results collected at 2024-12-02
- About average privacy settings, but should get better.
Security section:
- HTTPS by default is good! 5.00
- Strict Transport Security is pretty bad. 1.00
- Content Security Policy is pretty bad. 1.00
- Reporting CSP Certificate Transparency Network Error Logging is good! 5.00
- Referrer Policy is not that good. 2.50
- Subresource Integrity SRI is pretty bad. 1.00
- HTTP headers is ok, with 1 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 4.50
- Cookies is good! 5.00
Security section:
- HTTPS by default is good! 5.00
- Strict Transport Security is pretty bad. 1.00
- Content Security Policy is pretty bad. 1.00
- Reporting CSP Certificate Transparency Network Error Logging is good! 5.00
- Referrer Policy is not that good. 2.50
- Subresource Integrity SRI is pretty bad. 1.00
- HTTP headers is ok, with 1 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 4.50
- Cookies is good! 5.00
Energy Efficiency
3.80
Results collected at 2024-12-02
- Webpage generates little carbon dioxide!
- Carbon dioxide per pageview: 0.69 gram(s)
- More green than 76 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2024-03-31).
- More green than 74 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2022-12-16).
- Network transfer size: 1 mb 3.80
- Carbon dioxide per pageview: 0.69 gram(s)
- More green than 76 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2024-03-31).
- More green than 74 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2022-12-16).
- Network transfer size: 1 mb 3.80
Software
2.52
Results collected at 2024-12-02
- CMS used: wordpress
- Web server used: apache, nginx, tomcat
- Technology used: c, js, php, sass, scss
- License(s) used: apache-2.0, mit
- Metadata used: canonical, dns-prefetch, open-graph, viewport
- Javascript libraries used: bootstrap, jquery, jquery-migrate, owlcarousel2, smartmenus-jquery-plugin, smartmenus-jquery-plugin-bootstrap-4-addon
- Languages found: en-us, en_us
- Image formats used: gif, ico, jpeg, jpg, png, svg, webp
Security section:
##### Software related to CVE:s 1.0
###### Introduction:
Software version used is affected by vulnerability described below.
In most cases you can fix a CVE related issue by updating software to latest version.
In some rare cases there is no update and you need to consider not using the software affected.
###### Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures
- CVE-2024-6531
- CVE-2019-8331
- CVE-2018-14042
- CVE-2018-14041
- CVE-2018-14040
###### Detected software(s):
- bootstrap 4.0.0
- bootstrap 4
###### Affected resource(s):
- https://www.cdisol.blog/wp-content/themes/honeypress/assets/js/bootstrap.min.js?ver=6.7.1
- https://www.cdisol.blog/wp-content/themes/honeypress/assets/js/smartmenus/jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap-4.js?ver=6.7.1
##### Software is behind >=25 versions 2.75
###### Introduction:
Software used is behind 25 or more version compared to latests.
This is a good indicator that you need to update to latest version.
It also indicate that you don't have a good package routine for your software.
You can fix this by updating software to latest version.
###### Detected software(s):
- bootstrap 4.0.0
- bootstrap 4
###### Affected resource(s):
- https://www.cdisol.blog/wp-content/themes/honeypress/assets/js/bootstrap.min.js?ver=6.7.1
- https://www.cdisol.blog/wp-content/themes/honeypress/assets/js/smartmenus/jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap-4.js?ver=6.7.1
##### Software is behind >=1 versions 4.9
###### Introduction:
Software used is behind 1 or more version compared to latests.
This is a small indicator that you need to update to latest version.
You can fix this by updating software to latest version.
###### Detected software(s):
- jquery-migrate 3.4.1
- smartmenus-jquery-plugin 1.1.0
- owlcarousel2 2.2.1
###### Affected resource(s):
- https://c0.wp.com/c/6.7.1/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js
- https://www.cdisol.blog/wp-content/themes/honeypress/assets/js/smartmenus/jquery.smartmenus.js?ver=6.7.1
- https://www.cdisol.blog/wp-content/themes/honeypress/assets/js/owl.carousel.min.js?ver=6.7.1
##### Opensource software used seem to be maintained 5.00
##### You don't seem to be using 'END OF LIFE' software 5.00
- Web server used: apache, nginx, tomcat
- Technology used: c, js, php, sass, scss
- License(s) used: apache-2.0, mit
- Metadata used: canonical, dns-prefetch, open-graph, viewport
- Javascript libraries used: bootstrap, jquery, jquery-migrate, owlcarousel2, smartmenus-jquery-plugin, smartmenus-jquery-plugin-bootstrap-4-addon
- Languages found: en-us, en_us
- Image formats used: gif, ico, jpeg, jpg, png, svg, webp
Security section:
##### Software related to CVE:s 1.0
###### Introduction:
Software version used is affected by vulnerability described below.
In most cases you can fix a CVE related issue by updating software to latest version.
In some rare cases there is no update and you need to consider not using the software affected.
###### Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures
- CVE-2024-6531
- CVE-2019-8331
- CVE-2018-14042
- CVE-2018-14041
- CVE-2018-14040
###### Detected software(s):
- bootstrap 4.0.0
- bootstrap 4
###### Affected resource(s):
- https://www.cdisol.blog/wp-content/themes/honeypress/assets/js/bootstrap.min.js?ver=6.7.1
- https://www.cdisol.blog/wp-content/themes/honeypress/assets/js/smartmenus/jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap-4.js?ver=6.7.1
##### Software is behind >=25 versions 2.75
###### Introduction:
Software used is behind 25 or more version compared to latests.
This is a good indicator that you need to update to latest version.
It also indicate that you don't have a good package routine for your software.
You can fix this by updating software to latest version.
###### Detected software(s):
- bootstrap 4.0.0
- bootstrap 4
###### Affected resource(s):
- https://www.cdisol.blog/wp-content/themes/honeypress/assets/js/bootstrap.min.js?ver=6.7.1
- https://www.cdisol.blog/wp-content/themes/honeypress/assets/js/smartmenus/jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap-4.js?ver=6.7.1
##### Software is behind >=1 versions 4.9
###### Introduction:
Software used is behind 1 or more version compared to latests.
This is a small indicator that you need to update to latest version.
You can fix this by updating software to latest version.
###### Detected software(s):
- jquery-migrate 3.4.1
- smartmenus-jquery-plugin 1.1.0
- owlcarousel2 2.2.1
###### Affected resource(s):
- https://c0.wp.com/c/6.7.1/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js
- https://www.cdisol.blog/wp-content/themes/honeypress/assets/js/smartmenus/jquery.smartmenus.js?ver=6.7.1
- https://www.cdisol.blog/wp-content/themes/honeypress/assets/js/owl.carousel.min.js?ver=6.7.1
##### Opensource software used seem to be maintained 5.00
##### You don't seem to be using 'END OF LIFE' software 5.00