eric .st-pierre .xyz
4.32
Results from https://eric.st-pierre.xyz/
Lighthouse Performance
4.45
Results collected at 2024-11-09
- The website is fast.
Performance section:
- Total Blocking Time 5.00
- Largest Contentful Paint: 3.3 s 3.55
- Cumulative Layout Shift 5.00
- First Contentful Paint: 2.5 s 3.35
- Speed Index: 2.5 s 4.90
- Preconnect to required origins 1.00
- Largest Contentful Paint element 1.00
- Reduce unused JavaScript 1.00
- Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy: 7 resources found 2.50
- Eliminate render-blocking resources: Potential savings of 0 ms 2.50
- Reduce unused CSS: Potential savings of 12 KiB 2.50
- Time to Interactive: 3.3 s 4.70
- Max Potential First Input Delay: 90 ms 4.85
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- Screenshot Thumbnails 5.00
- Final Screenshot 5.00
- Initial server response time was short 5.00
- Avoid chaining critical requests 5.00
- Avoid multiple page redirects 5.00
- Minimizes main-thread work 5.00
- JavaScript execution time 5.00
- All text remains visible during webfont loads 5.00
- Diagnostics 5.00
- Network Requests 5.00
- Network Round Trip Times 5.00
- Server Backend Latencies 5.00
- Tasks 5.00
- Metrics 5.00
- Resources Summary 5.00
- Minimize third-party usage 5.00
- Avoid long main-thread tasks 5.00
- Image elements have explicit `width` and `height` 5.00
- Script Treemap Data 5.00
- Avoids enormous network payloads 5.00
- Defer offscreen images 5.00
- Minify CSS 5.00
- Minify JavaScript 5.00
- Serve images in next-gen formats 5.00
- Efficiently encode images 5.00
- Enable text compression 5.00
- Properly size images 5.00
- Use video formats for animated content 5.00
- Remove duplicate modules in JavaScript bundles 5.00
- Avoid serving legacy JavaScript to modern browsers 5.00
- Avoids an excessive DOM size 5.00
- Avoids `document.write()` 5.00
- Use HTTP/2 5.00
- Uses passive listeners to improve scrolling performance 5.00
- Page didn't prevent back/forward cache restoration 5.00
Performance section:
- Total Blocking Time 5.00
- Largest Contentful Paint: 3.3 s 3.55
- Cumulative Layout Shift 5.00
- First Contentful Paint: 2.5 s 3.35
- Speed Index: 2.5 s 4.90
- Preconnect to required origins 1.00
- Largest Contentful Paint element 1.00
- Reduce unused JavaScript 1.00
- Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy: 7 resources found 2.50
- Eliminate render-blocking resources: Potential savings of 0 ms 2.50
- Reduce unused CSS: Potential savings of 12 KiB 2.50
- Time to Interactive: 3.3 s 4.70
- Max Potential First Input Delay: 90 ms 4.85
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- Screenshot Thumbnails 5.00
- Final Screenshot 5.00
- Initial server response time was short 5.00
- Avoid chaining critical requests 5.00
- Avoid multiple page redirects 5.00
- Minimizes main-thread work 5.00
- JavaScript execution time 5.00
- All text remains visible during webfont loads 5.00
- Diagnostics 5.00
- Network Requests 5.00
- Network Round Trip Times 5.00
- Server Backend Latencies 5.00
- Tasks 5.00
- Metrics 5.00
- Resources Summary 5.00
- Minimize third-party usage 5.00
- Avoid long main-thread tasks 5.00
- Image elements have explicit `width` and `height` 5.00
- Script Treemap Data 5.00
- Avoids enormous network payloads 5.00
- Defer offscreen images 5.00
- Minify CSS 5.00
- Minify JavaScript 5.00
- Serve images in next-gen formats 5.00
- Efficiently encode images 5.00
- Enable text compression 5.00
- Properly size images 5.00
- Use video formats for animated content 5.00
- Remove duplicate modules in JavaScript bundles 5.00
- Avoid serving legacy JavaScript to modern browsers 5.00
- Avoids an excessive DOM size 5.00
- Avoids `document.write()` 5.00
- Use HTTP/2 5.00
- Uses passive listeners to improve scrolling performance 5.00
- Page didn't prevent back/forward cache restoration 5.00
404 Page
3.40
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- Correct status code? Got 404, and 404 is correct. 5.00
- Found a page title in the page's metadata? 5.00
- Found headline (h1)? 1.00
- Is it lacking text describing that an error has occurred (in Swedish OR English for English sites)? 1.00
- Is text content length is less than 150 characters, which indicates that the user is not being referred, nor advised? 5.00
- Found a page title in the page's metadata? 5.00
- Found headline (h1)? 1.00
- Is it lacking text describing that an error has occurred (in Swedish OR English for English sites)? 1.00
- Is text content length is less than 150 characters, which indicates that the user is not being referred, nor advised? 5.00
Lighthouse SEO
4.55
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- Pretty good at SEO, but still has some potential improvements.
- Links do not have descriptive text 1.00
- Page isn’t blocked from indexing 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- Document has a meta description 5.00
- Page has successful HTTP status code 5.00
- Links are crawlable 5.00
- Document has a valid `hreflang` 5.00
- Document has a valid `rel=canonical` 5.00
- Links do not have descriptive text 1.00
- Page isn’t blocked from indexing 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- Document has a meta description 5.00
- Page has successful HTTP status code 5.00
- Links are crawlable 5.00
- Document has a valid `hreflang` 5.00
- Document has a valid `rel=canonical` 5.00
Lighthouse Best Practices
5.00
Results collected at 2024-11-09
- The website is adhering to best practice according to Google Lighthouse!
- Uses HTTPS 5.00
- Avoids deprecated APIs 5.00
- Avoids third-party cookies 5.00
- Allows users to paste into input fields 5.00
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- No browser errors logged to the console 5.00
- Displays images with correct aspect ratio 5.00
- Serves images with appropriate resolution 5.00
- Page has the HTML doctype 5.00
- Properly defines charset 5.00
- Avoids requesting the geolocation permission on page load 5.00
- No issues in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools 5.00
- Avoids requesting the notification permission on page load 5.00
- Document uses legible font sizes 5.00
- Page has valid source maps 5.00
- Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks 5.00
- Uses HTTPS 5.00
- Avoids deprecated APIs 5.00
- Avoids third-party cookies 5.00
- Allows users to paste into input fields 5.00
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- No browser errors logged to the console 5.00
- Displays images with correct aspect ratio 5.00
- Serves images with appropriate resolution 5.00
- Page has the HTML doctype 5.00
- Properly defines charset 5.00
- Avoids requesting the geolocation permission on page load 5.00
- No issues in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools 5.00
- Avoids requesting the notification permission on page load 5.00
- Document uses legible font sizes 5.00
- Page has valid source maps 5.00
- Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks 5.00
W3C HTML
4.65
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- The tested page has 4 errors in its HTML code.
Standards section:
- #1: Webpage - Number of grouped error type: 2 4.60
- #1: Webpage - Number of errors: 3 4.70
- Bad value “true” for attribute “async” on element “script”. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- Attribute “value” not allowed on element “select” at this point. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- Bad value “true” for attribute “selected” on element “option”. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
Standards section:
- #1: Webpage - Number of grouped error type: 2 4.60
- #1: Webpage - Number of errors: 3 4.70
- Bad value “true” for attribute “async” on element “script”. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- Attribute “value” not allowed on element “select” at this point. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- Bad value “true” for attribute “selected” on element “option”. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
W3C CSS
4.40
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- The CSS is very good.
Standards section:
- `<style>` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `<style>` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 0 5.00
- `style=""` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `style=""` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 0 5.00
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 4 4.20
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 62 1.00
- CSS: “mask”: Too many values or values are not recognized. (number of errors of this type: 3)
- CSS: “--un-pan-x”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-pan-y”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-pinch-zoom”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-ordinal”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-slashed-zero”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-numeric-figure”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-numeric-spacing”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-numeric-fraction”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-shadow-inset”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-ring-inset”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-blur”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-brightness”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-contrast”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-drop-shadow”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-grayscale”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-hue-rotate”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-invert”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-saturate”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-sepia”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-backdrop-blur”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-backdrop-brightness”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-backdrop-contrast”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-backdrop-grayscale”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-backdrop-hue-rotate”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-backdrop-invert”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-backdrop-opacity”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-backdrop-saturate”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-backdrop-sepia”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “text-wrap”: Property “text-wrap” doesn't exist. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “grid-template-columns”: The types are incompatible. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “l-markdown-content”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- `content-type=".*css.*"`, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"`, number of errors: 0 5.00
Standards section:
- `<style>` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `<style>` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 0 5.00
- `style=""` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `style=""` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 0 5.00
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 4 4.20
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 62 1.00
- CSS: “mask”: Too many values or values are not recognized. (number of errors of this type: 3)
- CSS: “--un-pan-x”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-pan-y”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-pinch-zoom”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-ordinal”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-slashed-zero”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-numeric-figure”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-numeric-spacing”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-numeric-fraction”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-shadow-inset”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-ring-inset”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-blur”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-brightness”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-contrast”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-drop-shadow”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-grayscale”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-hue-rotate”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-invert”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-saturate”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-sepia”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-backdrop-blur”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-backdrop-brightness”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-backdrop-contrast”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-backdrop-grayscale”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-backdrop-hue-rotate”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-backdrop-invert”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-backdrop-opacity”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-backdrop-saturate”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “--un-backdrop-sepia”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- CSS: “text-wrap”: Property “text-wrap” doesn't exist. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “grid-template-columns”: The types are incompatible. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “l-markdown-content”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- `content-type=".*css.*"`, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"`, number of errors: 0 5.00
Standard Files
1.88
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- RSS subscription is missing in the HTML's metadata. 4.50
Standards section:
- robots.txt is missing, not allowed to download or has not the expected content. 1.00
- Sitemap is not specified in robots.txt 1.00
- security.txt has incorrect content. 1.00
Standards section:
- robots.txt is missing, not allowed to download or has not the expected content. 1.00
- Sitemap is not specified in robots.txt 1.00
- security.txt has incorrect content. 1.00
Lighthouse A11y
5.00
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- The website do not have any apparent issues with accessibility!
Accessibility section:
- `[aria-*]` attributes match their roles 5.00
- `[aria-hidden="true"]` is not present on the document `<body>` 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes have valid values 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes are valid and not misspelled 5.00
- Buttons have an accessible name 5.00
- `[user-scalable="no"]` is not used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element and the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is not less than 5. 5.00
- ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role 5.00
- `[aria-hidden="true"]` elements do not contain focusable descendents 5.00
- Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes 5.00
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- `<html>` element has a `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- `<html>` element has a valid value for its `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- Links have a discernible name 5.00
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing. 5.00
- `[lang]` attributes have a valid value 5.00
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order 5.00
- Uses ARIA roles only on compatible elements 5.00
- Identical links have the same purpose. 5.00
Accessibility section:
- `[aria-*]` attributes match their roles 5.00
- `[aria-hidden="true"]` is not present on the document `<body>` 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes have valid values 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes are valid and not misspelled 5.00
- Buttons have an accessible name 5.00
- `[user-scalable="no"]` is not used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element and the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is not less than 5. 5.00
- ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role 5.00
- `[aria-hidden="true"]` elements do not contain focusable descendents 5.00
- Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes 5.00
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- `<html>` element has a `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- `<html>` element has a valid value for its `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- Links have a discernible name 5.00
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing. 5.00
- `[lang]` attributes have a valid value 5.00
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order 5.00
- Uses ARIA roles only on compatible elements 5.00
- Identical links have the same purpose. 5.00
Sitespeed.io
4.74
Results collected at 2024-11-13
Performance section:
- [desktop] TTFB (Time to First Byte): 382.67ms, ±0.33ms 3.00
- [desktop] DOMContentLoaded: 645.67ms, ±7.33ms 4.71
- [desktop] FCP (First Contentful Paint): 653.67ms, ±6.33ms 5.00
- [desktop] LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): 653.67ms, ±6.33ms 3.00
- [desktop] Load: 646.00ms, ±7.00ms 4.71
- [desktop] FirstVisualChange: 601.50ms, ±68.50ms 4.80
- [desktop] SpeedIndex: 601.50ms, ±68.50ms 4.80
- [desktop] VisualComplete85: 601.50ms, ±68.50ms 4.80
- [desktop] CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] TBT (Total Blocking Time): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] firstPaint: 653.67ms, ±6.33ms
- [desktop] LastVisualChange: 601.50ms, ±68.50ms
- [mobile] TTFB (Time to First Byte): 383.67ms, ±1.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] DOMContentLoaded: 649.67ms, ±3.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] FCP (First Contentful Paint): 653.67ms, ±1.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): 653.67ms, ±1.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] Load: 650.00ms, ±3.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] FirstVisualChange: 600.50ms, ±66.50ms 5.00
- [mobile] SpeedIndex: 600.50ms, ±66.50ms 5.00
- [mobile] VisualComplete85: 600.50ms, ±66.50ms 5.00
- [mobile] CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] TBT (Total Blocking Time): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] firstPaint: 653.67ms, ±1.33ms
- [mobile] LastVisualChange: 600.50ms, ±66.50ms
- [desktop] TTFB (Time to First Byte): 382.67ms, ±0.33ms 3.00
- [desktop] DOMContentLoaded: 645.67ms, ±7.33ms 4.71
- [desktop] FCP (First Contentful Paint): 653.67ms, ±6.33ms 5.00
- [desktop] LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): 653.67ms, ±6.33ms 3.00
- [desktop] Load: 646.00ms, ±7.00ms 4.71
- [desktop] FirstVisualChange: 601.50ms, ±68.50ms 4.80
- [desktop] SpeedIndex: 601.50ms, ±68.50ms 4.80
- [desktop] VisualComplete85: 601.50ms, ±68.50ms 4.80
- [desktop] CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] TBT (Total Blocking Time): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] firstPaint: 653.67ms, ±6.33ms
- [desktop] LastVisualChange: 601.50ms, ±68.50ms
- [mobile] TTFB (Time to First Byte): 383.67ms, ±1.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] DOMContentLoaded: 649.67ms, ±3.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] FCP (First Contentful Paint): 653.67ms, ±1.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): 653.67ms, ±1.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] Load: 650.00ms, ±3.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] FirstVisualChange: 600.50ms, ±66.50ms 5.00
- [mobile] SpeedIndex: 600.50ms, ±66.50ms 5.00
- [mobile] VisualComplete85: 600.50ms, ±66.50ms 5.00
- [mobile] CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] TBT (Total Blocking Time): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] firstPaint: 653.67ms, ±1.33ms
- [mobile] LastVisualChange: 600.50ms, ±66.50ms
Yellow Lab Tools
4.90
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- The website has rather good frontend code. 4.90
- Network 4.95
- Images 5.00
- DOM complexity 5.00
- JS complexity 5.00
- Bad JS 5.00
- jQuery 5.00
- CSS complexity 4.80
- Bad CSS 4.15
- Web fonts 5.00
- Server config 4.90
Performance section:
- Number of iframes 5.00
- Total JS execution time 5.00
- DOM access 5.00
- Scroll events bound 5.00
- document.write calls 5.00
- Synchronous Ajax requests 5.00
- Rules count 5.00
- Total weight 5.00
- Gzip/Brotli compression 5.00
- File minification 4.50
- Requests number 5.00
- Different domains 5.00
- 404 not found 5.00
- Connections closed 5.00
- Identical content 5.00
- Below the fold images 5.00
- Webfonts number 5.00
- Overweighted webfonts 5.00
- WOFF 2 5.00
- HTTP protocols 5.00
- TLS protocols 5.00
- Caching disabled 5.00
- Caching not specified 4.00
- Caching too short 5.00
- Network 4.95
- Images 5.00
- DOM complexity 5.00
- JS complexity 5.00
- Bad JS 5.00
- jQuery 5.00
- CSS complexity 4.80
- Bad CSS 4.15
- Web fonts 5.00
- Server config 4.90
Performance section:
- Number of iframes 5.00
- Total JS execution time 5.00
- DOM access 5.00
- Scroll events bound 5.00
- document.write calls 5.00
- Synchronous Ajax requests 5.00
- Rules count 5.00
- Total weight 5.00
- Gzip/Brotli compression 5.00
- File minification 4.50
- Requests number 5.00
- Different domains 5.00
- 404 not found 5.00
- Connections closed 5.00
- Identical content 5.00
- Below the fold images 5.00
- Webfonts number 5.00
- Overweighted webfonts 5.00
- WOFF 2 5.00
- HTTP protocols 5.00
- TLS protocols 5.00
- Caching disabled 5.00
- Caching not specified 4.00
- Caching too short 5.00
Pa11y
4.70
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- The website can be more accessible, but is rather good!
Accessibility section:
- Number of types of issues: 2 4.60
- Number of issues: 2 4.80
##### Problems:
- A form field should be labelled in some way. Use the label element (either with a "for" attribute or wrapped around the form field), or "title", "aria-label" or "aria-labelledby" attributes as appropriate.
- A textinput element does not have a name available to an accessibility API. Valid names are: label element, title undefined, aria-label undefined, aria-labelledby undefined.
Accessibility section:
- Number of types of issues: 2 4.60
- Number of issues: 2 4.80
##### Problems:
- A form field should be labelled in some way. Use the label element (either with a "for" attribute or wrapped around the form field), or "title", "aria-label" or "aria-labelledby" attributes as appropriate.
- A textinput element does not have a name available to an accessibility API. Valid names are: label element, title undefined, aria-label undefined, aria-labelledby undefined.
Integrity & Security
2.75
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- Rather poor on user privacy.
Security section:
- HTTPS by default is good! 5.00
- Strict Transport Security is pretty bad. 1.00
- Content Security Policy is pretty bad. 1.00
- Reporting CSP Certificate Transparency Network Error Logging is good! 5.00
- Referrer Policy is not that good. 2.50
- Subresource Integrity SRI is pretty bad. 1.00
- HTTP headers is ok, with 1 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 4.50
- Cookies is ok, with 6 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 2.00
Security section:
- HTTPS by default is good! 5.00
- Strict Transport Security is pretty bad. 1.00
- Content Security Policy is pretty bad. 1.00
- Reporting CSP Certificate Transparency Network Error Logging is good! 5.00
- Referrer Policy is not that good. 2.50
- Subresource Integrity SRI is pretty bad. 1.00
- HTTP headers is ok, with 1 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 4.50
- Cookies is ok, with 6 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 2.00
Energy Efficiency
5.00
Results collected at 2024-11-09
- Webpage generates very little carbon dioxide!
- Carbon dioxide per pageview: 0.1 gram(s)
- More green than 98 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2024-03-31).
- More green than 99 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2022-12-16).
- Network transfer size: 161 kb 5.00
- Carbon dioxide per pageview: 0.1 gram(s)
- More green than 98 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2024-03-31).
- More green than 99 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2022-12-16).
- Network transfer size: 161 kb 5.00
Software
5.00
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- Web server used: apache
- License(s) used: apache-2.0
- Metadata used: canonical, open-graph, viewport
- Languages found: en
- Image formats used: svg
Security section:
##### NO Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures found 5.00
##### You seem to be up to date for all software we can identify 5.00
##### Opensource software used seem to be maintained 5.00
##### You don't seem to be using 'END OF LIFE' software 5.00
- License(s) used: apache-2.0
- Metadata used: canonical, open-graph, viewport
- Languages found: en
- Image formats used: svg
Security section:
##### NO Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures found 5.00
##### You seem to be up to date for all software we can identify 5.00
##### Opensource software used seem to be maintained 5.00
##### You don't seem to be using 'END OF LIFE' software 5.00