markeverard .com
4.29
Results from https://www.markeverard.com/
Lighthouse Performance
3.60
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- About average speed.
Performance section:
- Total Blocking Time 5.00
- Largest Contentful Paint: 5.6 s 1.00
- Cumulative Layout Shift 5.00
- First Contentful Paint: 3.4 s 1.80
- Speed Index: 3.4 s 4.45
- Largest Contentful Paint element 1.00
- Eliminate render-blocking resources 1.00
- Reduce unused CSS 1.00
- Reduce unused JavaScript 1.00
- Serve images in next-gen formats 1.00
- Properly size images 1.00
- Ensure text remains visible during webfont load: 2.50
- Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy: 11 resources found 2.50
- Avoid serving legacy JavaScript to modern browsers: Potential savings of 0 KiB 2.50
- Time to Interactive: 5.6 s 3.50
- Max Potential First Input Delay: 130 ms 4.45
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- Screenshot Thumbnails 5.00
- Final Screenshot 5.00
- Initial server response time was short 5.00
- User Timing marks and measures 5.00
- Avoid chaining critical requests 5.00
- Avoid multiple page redirects 5.00
- Minimizes main-thread work 5.00
- JavaScript execution time 5.00
- Preconnect to required origins 5.00
- Diagnostics 5.00
- Network Requests 5.00
- Network Round Trip Times 5.00
- Server Backend Latencies 5.00
- Tasks 5.00
- Metrics 5.00
- Resources Summary 5.00
- Minimize third-party usage 5.00
- Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded 5.00
- Avoid large layout shifts 5.00
- Avoid long main-thread tasks 5.00
- Image elements have explicit `width` and `height` 5.00
- Preload Largest Contentful Paint image 5.00
- Script Treemap Data 5.00
- Avoids enormous network payloads 5.00
- Defer offscreen images 5.00
- Minify CSS 5.00
- Minify JavaScript 5.00
- Efficiently encode images 5.00
- Enable text compression 5.00
- Use video formats for animated content 5.00
- Remove duplicate modules in JavaScript bundles 5.00
- Avoids an excessive DOM size 5.00
- Avoids `document.write()` 5.00
- Use HTTP/2 5.00
- Uses passive listeners to improve scrolling performance 5.00
- Page didn't prevent back/forward cache restoration 5.00
Performance section:
- Total Blocking Time 5.00
- Largest Contentful Paint: 5.6 s 1.00
- Cumulative Layout Shift 5.00
- First Contentful Paint: 3.4 s 1.80
- Speed Index: 3.4 s 4.45
- Largest Contentful Paint element 1.00
- Eliminate render-blocking resources 1.00
- Reduce unused CSS 1.00
- Reduce unused JavaScript 1.00
- Serve images in next-gen formats 1.00
- Properly size images 1.00
- Ensure text remains visible during webfont load: 2.50
- Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy: 11 resources found 2.50
- Avoid serving legacy JavaScript to modern browsers: Potential savings of 0 KiB 2.50
- Time to Interactive: 5.6 s 3.50
- Max Potential First Input Delay: 130 ms 4.45
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- Screenshot Thumbnails 5.00
- Final Screenshot 5.00
- Initial server response time was short 5.00
- User Timing marks and measures 5.00
- Avoid chaining critical requests 5.00
- Avoid multiple page redirects 5.00
- Minimizes main-thread work 5.00
- JavaScript execution time 5.00
- Preconnect to required origins 5.00
- Diagnostics 5.00
- Network Requests 5.00
- Network Round Trip Times 5.00
- Server Backend Latencies 5.00
- Tasks 5.00
- Metrics 5.00
- Resources Summary 5.00
- Minimize third-party usage 5.00
- Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded 5.00
- Avoid large layout shifts 5.00
- Avoid long main-thread tasks 5.00
- Image elements have explicit `width` and `height` 5.00
- Preload Largest Contentful Paint image 5.00
- Script Treemap Data 5.00
- Avoids enormous network payloads 5.00
- Defer offscreen images 5.00
- Minify CSS 5.00
- Minify JavaScript 5.00
- Efficiently encode images 5.00
- Enable text compression 5.00
- Use video formats for animated content 5.00
- Remove duplicate modules in JavaScript bundles 5.00
- Avoids an excessive DOM size 5.00
- Avoids `document.write()` 5.00
- Use HTTP/2 5.00
- Uses passive listeners to improve scrolling performance 5.00
- Page didn't prevent back/forward cache restoration 5.00
404 Page
5.00
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- Correct status code? Got 404, and 404 is correct. 5.00
- Found a page title in the page's metadata? 5.00
- Found headline (h1)? 5.00
- Is it lacking text describing that an error has occurred (in Swedish OR English for English sites)? 5.00
- Is text content length is less than 150 characters, which indicates that the user is not being referred, nor advised? 5.00
- Found a page title in the page's metadata? 5.00
- Found headline (h1)? 5.00
- Is it lacking text describing that an error has occurred (in Swedish OR English for English sites)? 5.00
- Is text content length is less than 150 characters, which indicates that the user is not being referred, nor advised? 5.00
Lighthouse SEO
4.55
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- Pretty good at SEO, but still has some potential improvements.
- Document does not have a meta description 1.00
- Page isn’t blocked from indexing 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- Image elements have `[alt]` attributes 5.00
- Page has successful HTTP status code 5.00
- Links have descriptive text 5.00
- Links are crawlable 5.00
- Document has a valid `hreflang` 5.00
- Document does not have a meta description 1.00
- Page isn’t blocked from indexing 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- Image elements have `[alt]` attributes 5.00
- Page has successful HTTP status code 5.00
- Links have descriptive text 5.00
- Links are crawlable 5.00
- Document has a valid `hreflang` 5.00
Lighthouse Best Practices
5.00
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- The website is adhering to best practice according to Google Lighthouse!
- Uses HTTPS 5.00
- Avoids deprecated APIs 5.00
- Avoids third-party cookies 5.00
- Allows users to paste into input fields 5.00
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- No browser errors logged to the console 5.00
- Displays images with correct aspect ratio 5.00
- Serves images with appropriate resolution 5.00
- Page has the HTML doctype 5.00
- Properly defines charset 5.00
- Avoids requesting the geolocation permission on page load 5.00
- No issues in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools 5.00
- Avoids requesting the notification permission on page load 5.00
- Document uses legible font sizes 5.00
- Page has valid source maps 5.00
- Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks 5.00
- Uses HTTPS 5.00
- Avoids deprecated APIs 5.00
- Avoids third-party cookies 5.00
- Allows users to paste into input fields 5.00
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- No browser errors logged to the console 5.00
- Displays images with correct aspect ratio 5.00
- Serves images with appropriate resolution 5.00
- Page has the HTML doctype 5.00
- Properly defines charset 5.00
- Avoids requesting the geolocation permission on page load 5.00
- No issues in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools 5.00
- Avoids requesting the notification permission on page load 5.00
- Document uses legible font sizes 5.00
- Page has valid source maps 5.00
- Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks 5.00
W3C HTML
3.70
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- The tested page has 40 errors in its HTML code.
Standards section:
- #1: Webpage - Number of grouped error type: 7 3.60
- #1: Webpage - Number of errors: 38 1.20
- Attribute “name” not allowed on element “meta” at this point. (errors of this type: 10 pcs)
- Element “meta” is missing one or more of the following attributes: “itemprop”, “property”. (errors of this type: 10 pcs)
- Element “header” not allowed as child of element “span” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.) (errors of this type: 5 pcs)
- Element “div” not allowed as child of element “span” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.) (errors of this type: 5 pcs)
- A “link” element must not appear as a descendant of a “body” element unless the “link” element has an “itemprop” attribute or has a “rel” attribute whose value contains “dns-prefetch”, “modulepreload”, “pingback”, “preconnect”, “prefetch”, “preload”, “prerender”, or “stylesheet”. (errors of this type: 3 pcs)
- Element “head” is missing a required instance of child element “title”. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- Element “title” not allowed as child of element “body” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.) (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- Stray end tag “head”. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- Start tag “body” seen but an element of the same type was already open. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- Attribute “feed.xml” not allowed on element “a” at this point. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- #14: a21516624425.ht- Number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- #14: a21516624425.ht- Number of errors: 0 5.00
Standards section:
- #1: Webpage - Number of grouped error type: 7 3.60
- #1: Webpage - Number of errors: 38 1.20
- Attribute “name” not allowed on element “meta” at this point. (errors of this type: 10 pcs)
- Element “meta” is missing one or more of the following attributes: “itemprop”, “property”. (errors of this type: 10 pcs)
- Element “header” not allowed as child of element “span” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.) (errors of this type: 5 pcs)
- Element “div” not allowed as child of element “span” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.) (errors of this type: 5 pcs)
- A “link” element must not appear as a descendant of a “body” element unless the “link” element has an “itemprop” attribute or has a “rel” attribute whose value contains “dns-prefetch”, “modulepreload”, “pingback”, “preconnect”, “prefetch”, “preload”, “prerender”, or “stylesheet”. (errors of this type: 3 pcs)
- Element “head” is missing a required instance of child element “title”. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- Element “title” not allowed as child of element “body” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.) (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- Stray end tag “head”. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- Start tag “body” seen but an element of the same type was already open. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- Attribute “feed.xml” not allowed on element “a” at this point. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- #14: a21516624425.ht- Number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- #14: a21516624425.ht- Number of errors: 0 5.00
W3C CSS
4.96
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- The CSS is very good.
Standards section:
- `style=""` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `style=""` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 0 5.00
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 1 4.80
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 1 4.90
- CSS: “background-position”: Too many values or values are not recognized. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- `<style>`, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `<style>`, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"`, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"`, number of errors: 0 5.00
Standards section:
- `style=""` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `style=""` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 0 5.00
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 1 4.80
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 1 4.90
- CSS: “background-position”: Too many values or values are not recognized. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- `<style>`, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `<style>`, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"`, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"`, number of errors: 0 5.00
Standard Files
2.00
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- RSS subscription found in webpage metadata. 5.00
Standards section:
- robots.txt is missing, not allowed to download or has not the expected content. 1.00
- Sitemap is not specified in robots.txt 1.00
- security.txt has incorrect content. 1.00
Standards section:
- robots.txt is missing, not allowed to download or has not the expected content. 1.00
- Sitemap is not specified in robots.txt 1.00
- security.txt has incorrect content. 1.00
Lighthouse A11y
4.40
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- The website can be more accessible, but is rather good!
Accessibility section:
- `[user-scalable="no"]` is used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element or the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is less than 5. 1.00
- Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio. 1.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes match their roles 5.00
- `[aria-hidden="true"]` is not present on the document `<body>` 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes have valid values 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes are valid and not misspelled 5.00
- Image elements have `[alt]` attributes 5.00
- ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role 5.00
- `[aria-hidden="true"]` elements do not contain focusable descendents 5.00
- Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- `<html>` element has a `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- `<html>` element has a valid value for its `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- Links have a discernible name 5.00
- Lists contain only `<li>` elements and script supporting elements (`<script>` and `<template>`). 5.00
- List items (`<li>`) are contained within `<ul>`, `<ol>` or `<menu>` parent elements 5.00
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing. 5.00
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order 5.00
- Image elements do not have `[alt]` attributes that are redundant text. 5.00
- Identical links have the same purpose. 5.00
- Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names. 5.00
- Document has a main landmark. 5.00
Accessibility section:
- `[user-scalable="no"]` is used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element or the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is less than 5. 1.00
- Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio. 1.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes match their roles 5.00
- `[aria-hidden="true"]` is not present on the document `<body>` 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes have valid values 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes are valid and not misspelled 5.00
- Image elements have `[alt]` attributes 5.00
- ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role 5.00
- `[aria-hidden="true"]` elements do not contain focusable descendents 5.00
- Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- `<html>` element has a `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- `<html>` element has a valid value for its `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- Links have a discernible name 5.00
- Lists contain only `<li>` elements and script supporting elements (`<script>` and `<template>`). 5.00
- List items (`<li>`) are contained within `<ul>`, `<ol>` or `<menu>` parent elements 5.00
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing. 5.00
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order 5.00
- Image elements do not have `[alt]` attributes that are redundant text. 5.00
- Identical links have the same purpose. 5.00
- Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names. 5.00
- Document has a main landmark. 5.00
Sitespeed.io
5.00
Results collected at 2024-11-13
Performance section:
- [desktop] TTFB (Time to First Byte): 67.50ms, ±7.50ms 5.00
- [desktop] DOMContentLoaded: 269.00ms, ±20.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] FCP (First Contentful Paint): 290.00ms, ±1.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): 324.00ms, ±14.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] Load: 412.67ms, ±19.33ms 5.00
- [desktop] CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] FirstVisualChange: 300.50ms, ±0.50ms 5.00
- [desktop] SpeedIndex: 328.50ms, ±4.50ms 5.00
- [desktop] VisualComplete85: 334.00ms, ±1.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] TBT (Total Blocking Time): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] firstPaint: 290.00ms, ±1.00ms
- [desktop] LastVisualChange: 350.50ms, ±17.50ms
- [mobile] TTFB (Time to First Byte): 67.50ms, ±0.50ms 5.00
- [mobile] DOMContentLoaded: 265.67ms, ±2.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] FCP (First Contentful Paint): 289.67ms, ±2.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): 312.67ms, ±4.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] Load: 436.00ms, ±6.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] FirstVisualChange: 300.50ms, ±0.50ms 5.00
- [mobile] SpeedIndex: 307.50ms, ±1.50ms 5.00
- [mobile] VisualComplete85: 300.50ms, ±0.50ms 5.00
- [mobile] CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] TBT (Total Blocking Time): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] firstPaint: 289.67ms, ±2.33ms
- [mobile] LastVisualChange: 751.00ms, ±83.00ms
- [desktop] TTFB (Time to First Byte): 67.50ms, ±7.50ms 5.00
- [desktop] DOMContentLoaded: 269.00ms, ±20.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] FCP (First Contentful Paint): 290.00ms, ±1.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): 324.00ms, ±14.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] Load: 412.67ms, ±19.33ms 5.00
- [desktop] CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] FirstVisualChange: 300.50ms, ±0.50ms 5.00
- [desktop] SpeedIndex: 328.50ms, ±4.50ms 5.00
- [desktop] VisualComplete85: 334.00ms, ±1.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] TBT (Total Blocking Time): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] firstPaint: 290.00ms, ±1.00ms
- [desktop] LastVisualChange: 350.50ms, ±17.50ms
- [mobile] TTFB (Time to First Byte): 67.50ms, ±0.50ms 5.00
- [mobile] DOMContentLoaded: 265.67ms, ±2.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] FCP (First Contentful Paint): 289.67ms, ±2.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): 312.67ms, ±4.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] Load: 436.00ms, ±6.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] FirstVisualChange: 300.50ms, ±0.50ms 5.00
- [mobile] SpeedIndex: 307.50ms, ±1.50ms 5.00
- [mobile] VisualComplete85: 300.50ms, ±0.50ms 5.00
- [mobile] CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] TBT (Total Blocking Time): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] firstPaint: 289.67ms, ±2.33ms
- [mobile] LastVisualChange: 751.00ms, ±83.00ms
Yellow Lab Tools
4.80
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- The website has rather good frontend code. 4.80
- Network 4.95
- Images 4.50
- DOM complexity 5.00
- JS complexity 5.00
- Bad JS 5.00
- jQuery 5.00
- CSS complexity 4.45
- Bad CSS 4.80
- Web fonts 3.95
- Server config 4.85
Performance section:
- Number of iframes 5.00
- Total JS execution time 5.00
- DOM access 5.00
- Scroll events bound 5.00
- document.write calls 5.00
- Synchronous Ajax requests 5.00
- Rules count 5.00
- Total weight 5.00
- Gzip/Brotli compression 4.25
- File minification 5.00
- Requests number 5.00
- Different domains 5.00
- 404 not found 5.00
- Connections closed 5.00
- Identical content 5.00
- Below the fold images 5.00
- Webfonts number 3.75
- Overweighted webfonts 3.25
- WOFF 2 5.00
- HTTP protocols 5.00
- TLS protocols 5.00
- Caching disabled 5.00
- Caching not specified 5.00
- Caching too short 3.75
- Network 4.95
- Images 4.50
- DOM complexity 5.00
- JS complexity 5.00
- Bad JS 5.00
- jQuery 5.00
- CSS complexity 4.45
- Bad CSS 4.80
- Web fonts 3.95
- Server config 4.85
Performance section:
- Number of iframes 5.00
- Total JS execution time 5.00
- DOM access 5.00
- Scroll events bound 5.00
- document.write calls 5.00
- Synchronous Ajax requests 5.00
- Rules count 5.00
- Total weight 5.00
- Gzip/Brotli compression 4.25
- File minification 5.00
- Requests number 5.00
- Different domains 5.00
- 404 not found 5.00
- Connections closed 5.00
- Identical content 5.00
- Below the fold images 5.00
- Webfonts number 3.75
- Overweighted webfonts 3.25
- WOFF 2 5.00
- HTTP protocols 5.00
- TLS protocols 5.00
- Caching disabled 5.00
- Caching not specified 5.00
- Caching too short 3.75
Pa11y
4.85
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- The website can be more accessible, but is rather good!
Accessibility section:
- Number of types of issues: 1 4.80
- Number of issues: 1 4.90
##### Problems:
- A title should be provided for the document, using a non-empty title element in the head section.
Accessibility section:
- Number of types of issues: 1 4.80
- Number of issues: 1 4.90
##### Problems:
- A title should be provided for the document, using a non-empty title element in the head section.
Integrity & Security
2.94
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- Rather poor on user privacy.
Security section:
- HTTPS by default is good! 5.00
- Strict Transport Security is pretty bad. 1.00
- Content Security Policy is pretty bad. 1.00
- Reporting CSP Certificate Transparency Network Error Logging is good! 5.00
- Referrer Policy is not that good. 2.50
- Subresource Integrity SRI is pretty bad. 1.00
- HTTP headers is ok, with 1 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 4.50
- Cookies is ok, with 3 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 3.50
Security section:
- HTTPS by default is good! 5.00
- Strict Transport Security is pretty bad. 1.00
- Content Security Policy is pretty bad. 1.00
- Reporting CSP Certificate Transparency Network Error Logging is good! 5.00
- Referrer Policy is not that good. 2.50
- Subresource Integrity SRI is pretty bad. 1.00
- HTTP headers is ok, with 1 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 4.50
- Cookies is ok, with 3 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 3.50
Energy Efficiency
4.30
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- Webpage generates little carbon dioxide!
- Carbon dioxide per pageview: 0.48 gram(s)
- More green than 86 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2024-03-31).
- More green than 86 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2022-12-16).
- Network transfer size: 772 kb 4.30
- Carbon dioxide per pageview: 0.48 gram(s)
- More green than 86 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2024-03-31).
- More green than 86 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2022-12-16).
- Network transfer size: 772 kb 4.30
Software
5.00
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- Technology used: es6, js
- License(s) used: apache-2.0
- Metadata used: canonical, open-graph, viewport
- Javascript libraries used: core-js, katex, mermaid, util
- Languages found: en, en_us
- Image formats used: ico, jpeg, jpg, png
Security section:
##### NO Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures found 5.00
##### You seem to be up to date for all software we can identify 5.00
##### Opensource software used seem to be maintained 5.00
##### You don't seem to be using 'END OF LIFE' software 5.00
- License(s) used: apache-2.0
- Metadata used: canonical, open-graph, viewport
- Javascript libraries used: core-js, katex, mermaid, util
- Languages found: en, en_us
- Image formats used: ico, jpeg, jpg, png
Security section:
##### NO Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures found 5.00
##### You seem to be up to date for all software we can identify 5.00
##### Opensource software used seem to be maintained 5.00
##### You don't seem to be using 'END OF LIFE' software 5.00