optimizelymvp .com

4.62

Results from https://optimizelymvp.com/

Lighthouse Performance

4.85

Results collected at 2024-11-13

- The website is fast.

Performance section:
- Total Blocking Time 5.00
- Largest Contentful Paint: 2.3 s 4.70
- Cumulative Layout Shift 5.00
- First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s 4.25
- Speed Index: 2.8 s 4.80
- Reduce initial server response time 1.00
- Avoid multiple page redirects 1.00
- Reduce unused CSS 1.00
- Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy: 7 resources found 2.50
- Reduce unused JavaScript: Potential savings of 81 KiB 2.50
- Time to Interactive: 3.8 s 4.45
- Max Potential First Input Delay: 110 ms 4.75
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- Screenshot Thumbnails 5.00
- Final Screenshot 5.00
- Avoid chaining critical requests 5.00
- Minimizes main-thread work 5.00
- JavaScript execution time 5.00
- Preconnect to required origins 5.00
- All text remains visible during webfont loads 5.00
- Diagnostics 5.00
- Network Requests 5.00
- Network Round Trip Times 5.00
- Server Backend Latencies 5.00
- Tasks 5.00
- Metrics 5.00
- Resources Summary 5.00
- Minimize third-party usage 5.00
- Largest Contentful Paint element 5.00
- Avoid long main-thread tasks 5.00
- Image elements have explicit `width` and `height` 5.00
- Script Treemap Data 5.00
- Avoids enormous network payloads 5.00
- Defer offscreen images 5.00
- Eliminate render-blocking resources 5.00
- Minify CSS 5.00
- Minify JavaScript 5.00
- Serve images in next-gen formats 5.00
- Efficiently encode images 5.00
- Enable text compression 5.00
- Properly size images 5.00
- Use video formats for animated content 5.00
- Remove duplicate modules in JavaScript bundles 5.00
- Avoid serving legacy JavaScript to modern browsers 5.00
- Avoids an excessive DOM size 5.00
- Avoids `document.write()` 5.00
- Use HTTP/2 5.00
- Uses passive listeners to improve scrolling performance 5.00
- Page didn't prevent back/forward cache restoration 5.00

404 Page

5.00

Results collected at 2024-11-13

- Correct status code? Got 404, and 404 is correct. 5.00
- Found a page title in the page's metadata? 5.00
- Found headline (h1)? 5.00
- Is it lacking text describing that an error has occurred (in Swedish OR English for English sites)? 5.00
- Is text content length is less than 150 characters, which indicates that the user is not being referred, nor advised? 5.00

Lighthouse SEO

4.60

Results collected at 2024-11-13

- Pretty good at SEO, but still has some potential improvements.
- Links do not have descriptive text 1.00
- Page isn’t blocked from indexing 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- Image elements have `[alt]` attributes 5.00
- Document has a meta description 5.00
- Page has successful HTTP status code 5.00
- Links are crawlable 5.00
- robots.txt is valid 5.00
- Document has a valid `hreflang` 5.00
- Document has a valid `rel=canonical` 5.00

Lighthouse Best Practices

5.00

Results collected at 2024-11-13

- The website is adhering to best practice according to Google Lighthouse!
- Uses HTTPS 5.00
- Avoids deprecated APIs 5.00
- Avoids third-party cookies 5.00
- Allows users to paste into input fields 5.00
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- No browser errors logged to the console 5.00
- Displays images with correct aspect ratio 5.00
- Serves images with appropriate resolution 5.00
- Page has the HTML doctype 5.00
- Properly defines charset 5.00
- Avoids requesting the geolocation permission on page load 5.00
- No issues in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools 5.00
- Avoids requesting the notification permission on page load 5.00
- Document uses legible font sizes 5.00
- Page has valid source maps 5.00
- Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks 5.00
- Detected JavaScript libraries 5.00

W3C HTML

4.85

Results collected at 2024-11-13

- The tested page has 1 errors in its HTML code.

Standards section:
- #1: Webpage - Number of grouped error type: 1 4.80
- #1: Webpage - Number of errors: 1 4.90
- Element “style” not allowed as child of element “body” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.) (errors of this type: 1 pcs)

W3C CSS

4.75

Results collected at 2024-11-13

- The CSS is very good.

Standards section:
- `<style>` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `<style>` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 0 5.00
- `style=""` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `style=""` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 0 5.00
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 4 4.20
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 12 3.80
- CSS: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 5)
- CSS: “rotate”: Property “rotate” doesn't exist. (number of errors of this type: 3)
- CSS: “scrollbar-gutter”: Property “scrollbar-gutter” doesn't exist. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “right”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “top”: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “padding”: The types are incompatible. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- `content-type=".*css.*"`, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"`, number of errors: 0 5.00

Standard Files

4.00

Results collected at 2024-11-13

- RSS subscription found in webpage metadata. 5.00

Standards section:
- robots.txt seems ok. 5.00
- Sitemap, Url in <loc> is starting with https:// 5.00
- Sitemap, Url in <loc> is using same domain as robots.txt 5.00
- Sitemap, No duplicate Urls in <loc> 5.00
- Sitemap, is only listing webpages 5.00
- Sitemap(s) are only specified once 5.00
- Sitemap, is under 50 000 items 5.00
- Sitemap, is under 50 000 items 5.00
- Sitemap, is under 50 000 items 5.00
- The Sitemap is neither good or bad. 5.00
- security.txt has incorrect content. 1.00

Lighthouse A11y

5.00

Results collected at 2024-11-13

- The website do not have any apparent issues with accessibility!

Accessibility section:
- `[aria-*]` attributes match their roles 5.00
- `[aria-hidden="true"]` is not present on the document `<body>` 5.00
- `[role]`s have all required `[aria-*]` attributes 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes have valid values 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes are valid and not misspelled 5.00
- Buttons have an accessible name 5.00
- Image elements have `[alt]` attributes 5.00
- `[user-scalable="no"]` is not used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element and the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is not less than 5. 5.00
- ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role 5.00
- `[aria-hidden="true"]` elements do not contain focusable descendents 5.00
- Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes 5.00
- `[role]` values are valid 5.00
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- `<html>` element has a `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- `<html>` element has a valid value for its `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- Form elements have associated labels 5.00
- Links have a discernible name 5.00
- Links are distinguishable without relying on color. 5.00
- Lists contain only `<li>` elements and script supporting elements (`<script>` and `<template>`). 5.00
- List items (`<li>`) are contained within `<ul>`, `<ol>` or `<menu>` parent elements 5.00
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing. 5.00
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order 5.00
- Skip links are focusable. 5.00
- Uses ARIA roles only on compatible elements 5.00
- Deprecated ARIA roles were not used 5.00
- Image elements do not have `[alt]` attributes that are redundant text. 5.00
- Identical links have the same purpose. 5.00
- Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names. 5.00

Yellow Lab Tools

4.85

Results collected at 2024-11-13

- The website has rather good frontend code. 4.85
- Network 4.95
- Images 4.85
- DOM complexity 5.00
- JS complexity 5.00
- Bad JS 5.00
- jQuery 5.00
- CSS complexity 3.55
- Bad CSS 4.55
- Web fonts 5.00
- Server config 4.65

Performance section:
- Number of iframes 5.00
- Total JS execution time 5.00
- DOM access 5.00
- Scroll events bound 5.00
- document.write calls 5.00
- Synchronous Ajax requests 5.00
- Rules count 5.00
- Total weight 5.00
- Gzip/Brotli compression 5.00
- File minification 4.45
- Requests number 5.00
- Different domains 5.00
- 404 not found 5.00
- Connections closed 5.00
- Identical content 5.00
- Below the fold images 5.00
- Webfonts number 5.00
- Overweighted webfonts 5.00
- WOFF 2 5.00
- HTTP protocols 5.00
- TLS protocols 4.00
- Caching disabled 5.00
- Caching not specified 4.00
- Caching too short 5.00

Pa11y

4.40

Results collected at 2024-11-13

- The website can be more accessible, but is rather good!

Accessibility section:
- Number of types of issues: 1 4.80
- Number of issues: 10 4.00

##### Problems:
- Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.8/aria-prohibited-attr?application=axeAPI)

Integrity & Security

2.75

Results collected at 2024-11-13

- Rather poor on user privacy.

Security section:
- HTTPS by default is good! 5.00
- Strict Transport Security is pretty bad. 1.00
- Content Security Policy is pretty bad. 1.00
- Reporting CSP Certificate Transparency Network Error Logging is good! 5.00
- Referrer Policy is not that good. 2.50
- Subresource Integrity SRI is pretty bad. 1.00
- HTTP headers is ok, with 1 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 4.50
- Cookies is ok, with 6 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 2.00

Energy Efficiency

5.00

Results collected at 2024-11-13

- Webpage generates very little carbon dioxide!
- Carbon dioxide per pageview: 0.14 gram(s)
- More green than 97 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2024-03-31).
- More green than 98 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2022-12-16).
- Network transfer size: 234 kb 5.00

Software

5.00

Results collected at 2024-11-13

- CMS used: wordpress
- Web server used: nginx, tomcat
- Technology used: c, php
- License(s) used: apache-2.0
- Metadata used: apple-touch-icon, canonical, icon, open-graph, viewport
- Languages found: en-gb, en_gb
- Image formats used: jpeg, jpg, png

Security section:
##### NO Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures found 5.00
##### You seem to be up to date for all software we can identify 5.00
##### Opensource software used seem to be maintained 5.00
##### You don't seem to be using 'END OF LIFE' software 5.00