ravindrarathore .com
3.61
Results from http://www.ravindrarathore.com/
Lighthouse Performance
2.95
Results collected at 2024-10-16
- The website is quite slow.
Performance section:
- Total Blocking Time: 190 ms 4.50
- Largest Contentful Paint: 8.8 s 1.00
- Cumulative Layout Shift 5.00
- First Contentful Paint: 4.5 s 1.00
- Speed Index: 5.8 s 2.45
- Time to Interactive: 12.8 s 1.00
- Avoid multiple page redirects 1.00
- Minimize main-thread work 1.00
- Preconnect to required origins 1.00
- Reduce the impact of third-party code 1.00
- Largest Contentful Paint element 1.00
- Defer offscreen images 1.00
- Eliminate render-blocking resources 1.00
- Minify CSS 1.00
- Reduce unused CSS 1.00
- Reduce unused JavaScript 1.00
- Serve images in next-gen formats 1.00
- Properly size images 1.00
- Use HTTP/2 1.00
- Ensure text remains visible during webfont load: 2.50
- Image elements do not have explicit `width` and `height`: 2.50
- Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy: 25 resources found 2.50
- Minify JavaScript: Potential savings of 9 KiB 2.50
- Efficiently encode images: Potential savings of 122 KiB 2.50
- Avoid serving legacy JavaScript to modern browsers: Potential savings of 7 KiB 2.50
- Does not use passive listeners to improve scrolling performance: 2.50
- Max Potential First Input Delay: 150 ms 4.25
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- Screenshot Thumbnails 5.00
- Final Screenshot 5.00
- Initial server response time was short 5.00
- Avoid chaining critical requests 5.00
- JavaScript execution time 5.00
- Diagnostics 5.00
- Network Requests 5.00
- Network Round Trip Times 5.00
- Server Backend Latencies 5.00
- Tasks 5.00
- Metrics 5.00
- Resources Summary 5.00
- Avoid large layout shifts 5.00
- Avoid long main-thread tasks 5.00
- Avoid non-composited animations 5.00
- Script Treemap Data 5.00
- Avoids enormous network payloads 5.00
- Enable text compression 5.00
- Use video formats for animated content 5.00
- Remove duplicate modules in JavaScript bundles 5.00
- Avoids an excessive DOM size 5.00
- Avoids `document.write()` 5.00
- Page didn't prevent back/forward cache restoration 5.00
Performance section:
- Total Blocking Time: 190 ms 4.50
- Largest Contentful Paint: 8.8 s 1.00
- Cumulative Layout Shift 5.00
- First Contentful Paint: 4.5 s 1.00
- Speed Index: 5.8 s 2.45
- Time to Interactive: 12.8 s 1.00
- Avoid multiple page redirects 1.00
- Minimize main-thread work 1.00
- Preconnect to required origins 1.00
- Reduce the impact of third-party code 1.00
- Largest Contentful Paint element 1.00
- Defer offscreen images 1.00
- Eliminate render-blocking resources 1.00
- Minify CSS 1.00
- Reduce unused CSS 1.00
- Reduce unused JavaScript 1.00
- Serve images in next-gen formats 1.00
- Properly size images 1.00
- Use HTTP/2 1.00
- Ensure text remains visible during webfont load: 2.50
- Image elements do not have explicit `width` and `height`: 2.50
- Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy: 25 resources found 2.50
- Minify JavaScript: Potential savings of 9 KiB 2.50
- Efficiently encode images: Potential savings of 122 KiB 2.50
- Avoid serving legacy JavaScript to modern browsers: Potential savings of 7 KiB 2.50
- Does not use passive listeners to improve scrolling performance: 2.50
- Max Potential First Input Delay: 150 ms 4.25
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- Screenshot Thumbnails 5.00
- Final Screenshot 5.00
- Initial server response time was short 5.00
- Avoid chaining critical requests 5.00
- JavaScript execution time 5.00
- Diagnostics 5.00
- Network Requests 5.00
- Network Round Trip Times 5.00
- Server Backend Latencies 5.00
- Tasks 5.00
- Metrics 5.00
- Resources Summary 5.00
- Avoid large layout shifts 5.00
- Avoid long main-thread tasks 5.00
- Avoid non-composited animations 5.00
- Script Treemap Data 5.00
- Avoids enormous network payloads 5.00
- Enable text compression 5.00
- Use video formats for animated content 5.00
- Remove duplicate modules in JavaScript bundles 5.00
- Avoids an excessive DOM size 5.00
- Avoids `document.write()` 5.00
- Page didn't prevent back/forward cache restoration 5.00
404 Page
4.20
Results collected at 2024-10-16
- Correct status code? Got 404, and 404 is correct. 5.00
- Found a page title in the page's metadata? 5.00
- Found headline (h1)? 5.00
- Is it lacking text describing that an error has occurred (in Swedish OR English for English sites)? 1.00
- Is text content length is less than 150 characters, which indicates that the user is not being referred, nor advised? 5.00
- Found a page title in the page's metadata? 5.00
- Found headline (h1)? 5.00
- Is it lacking text describing that an error has occurred (in Swedish OR English for English sites)? 1.00
- Is text content length is less than 150 characters, which indicates that the user is not being referred, nor advised? 5.00
Lighthouse SEO
5.00
Results collected at 2024-10-16
- The webpage is really optimised for SEO!
- Page isn’t blocked from indexing 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- Image elements have `[alt]` attributes 5.00
- Document has a meta description 5.00
- Page has successful HTTP status code 5.00
- Links have descriptive text 5.00
- Links are crawlable 5.00
- Document has a valid `hreflang` 5.00
- Page isn’t blocked from indexing 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- Image elements have `[alt]` attributes 5.00
- Document has a meta description 5.00
- Page has successful HTTP status code 5.00
- Links have descriptive text 5.00
- Links are crawlable 5.00
- Document has a valid `hreflang` 5.00
Lighthouse Best Practices
3.80
Results collected at 2024-10-16
- About average on following best practice
- Does not use HTTPS 1.00
- Does not redirect HTTP traffic to HTTPS 1.00
- Serves images with low resolution 1.00
- Avoids deprecated APIs 5.00
- Avoids third-party cookies 5.00
- Allows users to paste into input fields 5.00
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- No browser errors logged to the console 5.00
- Displays images with correct aspect ratio 5.00
- Page has the HTML doctype 5.00
- Properly defines charset 5.00
- Avoids requesting the geolocation permission on page load 5.00
- No issues in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools 5.00
- Avoids requesting the notification permission on page load 5.00
- Document uses legible font sizes 5.00
- Page has valid source maps 5.00
- Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks 5.00
- Detected JavaScript libraries 5.00
- Does not use HTTPS 1.00
- Does not redirect HTTP traffic to HTTPS 1.00
- Serves images with low resolution 1.00
- Avoids deprecated APIs 5.00
- Avoids third-party cookies 5.00
- Allows users to paste into input fields 5.00
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- No browser errors logged to the console 5.00
- Displays images with correct aspect ratio 5.00
- Page has the HTML doctype 5.00
- Properly defines charset 5.00
- Avoids requesting the geolocation permission on page load 5.00
- No issues in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools 5.00
- Avoids requesting the notification permission on page load 5.00
- Document uses legible font sizes 5.00
- Page has valid source maps 5.00
- Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks 5.00
- Detected JavaScript libraries 5.00
W3C HTML
4.95
Results collected at 2024-10-16
- The tested page has 3 errors in its HTML code.
Standards section:
- #1: Webpage - Number of grouped error type: 1 4.80
- #1: Webpage - Number of errors: 1 4.90
- Attribute “w3-include-html” not allowed on element “footer” at this point. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- #37: footer.html- Number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- #37: footer.html- Number of errors: 0 5.00
- #38: anchor- Number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- #38: anchor- Number of errors: 0 5.00
Standards section:
- #1: Webpage - Number of grouped error type: 1 4.80
- #1: Webpage - Number of errors: 1 4.90
- Attribute “w3-include-html” not allowed on element “footer” at this point. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- #37: footer.html- Number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- #37: footer.html- Number of errors: 0 5.00
- #38: anchor- Number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- #38: anchor- Number of errors: 0 5.00
W3C CSS
4.90
Results collected at 2024-10-16
- The CSS is good.
Standards section:
- `style=""` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `style=""` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 0 5.00
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 0 5.00
- `<style>` in: #38: anchor, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `<style>` in: #38: anchor, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #38: anchor, number of grouped error type: 2 4.60
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #38: anchor, number of errors: 2 4.80
- CSS: “box-flex”: Property “box-flex” doesn't exist. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “box-shadow”: Too many values or values are not recognized. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #4: bootstrap.min.c, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #4: bootstrap.min.c, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #5: font-awesome.mi, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #5: font-awesome.mi, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #6: flaticon.css, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #6: flaticon.css, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #7: plugins.css, number of grouped error type: 1 4.80
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #7: plugins.css, number of errors: 1 4.90
- CSS: “display”: “box” is not a “display” value. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #8: style.css, number of grouped error type: 1 4.80
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #8: style.css, number of errors: 2 4.80
- CSS: “display”: “box” is not a “display” value. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “border-width”: “80%” is not a “border-width” value. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #9: color.css, number of grouped error type: 1 4.80
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #9: color.css, number of errors: 2 4.80
- CSS: “display”: “box” is not a “display” value. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “border-width”: “80%” is not a “border-width” value. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #25: css, number of grouped error type: 1 4.80
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #25: css, number of errors: 2 4.80
- CSS: “display”: “box” is not a “display” value. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “border-width”: “80%” is not a “border-width” value. (number of errors of this type: 1)
Standards section:
- `style=""` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `style=""` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 0 5.00
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #1: Webpage , number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #1: Webpage , number of errors: 0 5.00
- `<style>` in: #38: anchor, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `<style>` in: #38: anchor, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #38: anchor, number of grouped error type: 2 4.60
- `<link rel="stylesheet">` in: #38: anchor, number of errors: 2 4.80
- CSS: “box-flex”: Property “box-flex” doesn't exist. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “box-shadow”: Too many values or values are not recognized. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #4: bootstrap.min.c, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #4: bootstrap.min.c, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #5: font-awesome.mi, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #5: font-awesome.mi, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #6: flaticon.css, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #6: flaticon.css, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #7: plugins.css, number of grouped error type: 1 4.80
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #7: plugins.css, number of errors: 1 4.90
- CSS: “display”: “box” is not a “display” value. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #8: style.css, number of grouped error type: 1 4.80
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #8: style.css, number of errors: 2 4.80
- CSS: “display”: “box” is not a “display” value. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “border-width”: “80%” is not a “border-width” value. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #9: color.css, number of grouped error type: 1 4.80
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #9: color.css, number of errors: 2 4.80
- CSS: “display”: “box” is not a “display” value. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “border-width”: “80%” is not a “border-width” value. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #25: css, number of grouped error type: 1 4.80
- `content-type=".*css.*"` in: #25: css, number of errors: 2 4.80
- CSS: “display”: “box” is not a “display” value. (number of errors of this type: 1)
- CSS: “border-width”: “80%” is not a “border-width” value. (number of errors of this type: 1)
Standard Files
1.88
Results collected at 2024-10-16
- RSS subscription is missing in the HTML's metadata. 4.50
Standards section:
- robots.txt is missing, not allowed to download or has not the expected content. 1.00
- Sitemap is not specified in robots.txt 1.00
- security.txt has incorrect content. 1.00
Standards section:
- robots.txt is missing, not allowed to download or has not the expected content. 1.00
- Sitemap is not specified in robots.txt 1.00
- security.txt has incorrect content. 1.00
Lighthouse A11y
4.60
Results collected at 2024-10-16
- The website can be more accessible, but is rather good!
Accessibility section:
- Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio. 1.00
- Links do not have a discernible name 1.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes match their roles 5.00
- `[aria-hidden="true"]` is not present on the document `<body>` 5.00
- `[role]`s have all required `[aria-*]` attributes 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes have valid values 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes are valid and not misspelled 5.00
- Buttons have an accessible name 5.00
- Image elements have `[alt]` attributes 5.00
- `[user-scalable="no"]` is not used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element and the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is not less than 5. 5.00
- ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role 5.00
- `[aria-hidden="true"]` elements do not contain focusable descendents 5.00
- Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes 5.00
- `[role]` values are valid 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- `<frame>` or `<iframe>` elements have a title 5.00
- `<html>` element has a `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- `<html>` element has a valid value for its `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- Lists contain only `<li>` elements and script supporting elements (`<script>` and `<template>`). 5.00
- List items (`<li>`) are contained within `<ul>`, `<ol>` or `<menu>` parent elements 5.00
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing. 5.00
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order 5.00
- Uses ARIA roles only on compatible elements 5.00
- Deprecated ARIA roles were not used 5.00
- Image elements do not have `[alt]` attributes that are redundant text. 5.00
- Document has a main landmark. 5.00
Accessibility section:
- Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio. 1.00
- Links do not have a discernible name 1.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes match their roles 5.00
- `[aria-hidden="true"]` is not present on the document `<body>` 5.00
- `[role]`s have all required `[aria-*]` attributes 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes have valid values 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes are valid and not misspelled 5.00
- Buttons have an accessible name 5.00
- Image elements have `[alt]` attributes 5.00
- `[user-scalable="no"]` is not used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element and the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is not less than 5. 5.00
- ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role 5.00
- `[aria-hidden="true"]` elements do not contain focusable descendents 5.00
- Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes 5.00
- `[role]` values are valid 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- `<frame>` or `<iframe>` elements have a title 5.00
- `<html>` element has a `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- `<html>` element has a valid value for its `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- Lists contain only `<li>` elements and script supporting elements (`<script>` and `<template>`). 5.00
- List items (`<li>`) are contained within `<ul>`, `<ol>` or `<menu>` parent elements 5.00
- Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing. 5.00
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order 5.00
- Uses ARIA roles only on compatible elements 5.00
- Deprecated ARIA roles were not used 5.00
- Image elements do not have `[alt]` attributes that are redundant text. 5.00
- Document has a main landmark. 5.00
Sitespeed.io
4.64
Results collected at 2024-10-16
Performance section:
- [desktop] TTFB (Time to First Byte): 71.50ms, ±0.50ms 5.00
- [desktop] DOMContentLoaded: 488.00ms, ±7.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] FCP (First Contentful Paint): 345.00ms, ±10.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): 426.00ms, ±9.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] Load: 855.00ms, ±16.00ms 4.29
- [desktop] CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] FirstVisualChange: 351.50ms, ±16.50ms 5.00
- [desktop] SpeedIndex: 1770.00ms, ±20.00ms 2.46
- [desktop] VisualComplete85: 1820.00ms, ±20.00ms 2.36
- [desktop] TBT (Total Blocking Time): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] firstPaint: 345.00ms, ±10.00ms
- [desktop] LastVisualChange: 6645.00ms, ±5.00ms
- [mobile] TTFB (Time to First Byte): 65.00ms, ±2.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] DOMContentLoaded: 435.00ms, ±15.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] FCP (First Contentful Paint): 319.00ms, ±15.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): 392.67ms, ±8.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] Load: 779.67ms, ±39.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] FirstVisualChange: 318.00ms, ±17.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] SpeedIndex: 1785.00ms, ±25.00ms 4.43
- [mobile] VisualComplete85: 1835.00ms, ±35.00ms 4.33
- [mobile] TBT (Total Blocking Time): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] firstPaint: 319.00ms, ±15.00ms
- [mobile] LastVisualChange: 6615.00ms, ±35.00ms
- [desktop] TTFB (Time to First Byte): 71.50ms, ±0.50ms 5.00
- [desktop] DOMContentLoaded: 488.00ms, ±7.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] FCP (First Contentful Paint): 345.00ms, ±10.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): 426.00ms, ±9.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] Load: 855.00ms, ±16.00ms 4.29
- [desktop] CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] FirstVisualChange: 351.50ms, ±16.50ms 5.00
- [desktop] SpeedIndex: 1770.00ms, ±20.00ms 2.46
- [desktop] VisualComplete85: 1820.00ms, ±20.00ms 2.36
- [desktop] TBT (Total Blocking Time): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] firstPaint: 345.00ms, ±10.00ms
- [desktop] LastVisualChange: 6645.00ms, ±5.00ms
- [mobile] TTFB (Time to First Byte): 65.00ms, ±2.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] DOMContentLoaded: 435.00ms, ±15.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] FCP (First Contentful Paint): 319.00ms, ±15.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): 392.67ms, ±8.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] Load: 779.67ms, ±39.33ms 5.00
- [mobile] CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] FirstVisualChange: 318.00ms, ±17.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] SpeedIndex: 1785.00ms, ±25.00ms 4.43
- [mobile] VisualComplete85: 1835.00ms, ±35.00ms 4.33
- [mobile] TBT (Total Blocking Time): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] firstPaint: 319.00ms, ±15.00ms
- [mobile] LastVisualChange: 6615.00ms, ±35.00ms
Yellow Lab Tools
3.90
Results collected at 2024-10-16
- The website is neither good nor bad. 3.90
- Network 4.90
- Images 1.20
- DOM complexity 5.00
- JS complexity 4.85
- Bad JS 5.00
- jQuery 5.00
- CSS complexity 2.80
- Bad CSS 2.80
- Web fonts 2.40
- Server config 4.45
Performance section:
- Number of iframes 5.00
- Total JS execution time 5.00
- DOM access 4.75
- Scroll events bound 4.30
- document.write calls 5.00
- Synchronous Ajax requests 5.00
- Rules count 4.20
- Total weight 5.00
- Gzip/Brotli compression 4.95
- File minification 4.05
- Requests number 5.00
- Different domains 5.00
- 404 not found 5.00
- Connections closed 5.00
- Identical content 5.00
- Below the fold images 3.20
- Webfonts number 1.00
- Overweighted webfonts 4.65
- WOFF 2 5.00
- HTTP protocols 5.00
- TLS protocols 5.00
- Caching disabled 5.00
- Caching not specified 5.00
- Caching too short 1.00
- Network 4.90
- Images 1.20
- DOM complexity 5.00
- JS complexity 4.85
- Bad JS 5.00
- jQuery 5.00
- CSS complexity 2.80
- Bad CSS 2.80
- Web fonts 2.40
- Server config 4.45
Performance section:
- Number of iframes 5.00
- Total JS execution time 5.00
- DOM access 4.75
- Scroll events bound 4.30
- document.write calls 5.00
- Synchronous Ajax requests 5.00
- Rules count 4.20
- Total weight 5.00
- Gzip/Brotli compression 4.95
- File minification 4.05
- Requests number 5.00
- Different domains 5.00
- 404 not found 5.00
- Connections closed 5.00
- Identical content 5.00
- Below the fold images 3.20
- Webfonts number 1.00
- Overweighted webfonts 4.65
- WOFF 2 5.00
- HTTP protocols 5.00
- TLS protocols 5.00
- Caching disabled 5.00
- Caching not specified 5.00
- Caching too short 1.00
Pa11y
3.10
Results collected at 2024-10-16
- The accessibility is really bad! Probably both for disabled people and everyone of us when we need some accessibility!
Accessibility section:
- Number of types of issues: 8 3.40
- Number of issues: 22 2.80
##### Problems:
- Anchor element found with a valid href attribute, but no link content has been supplied.
- A emailinput element does not have a name available to an accessibility API. Valid names are: label element, title undefined, aria-label undefined, aria-labelledby undefined.
- A element has insufficient contrast at this conformance level. Expected a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, but text in this element has a contrast ratio of 3.9:1. Recommendation: change text colour to #767676.
- Iframe element requires a non-empty title attribute that identifies the frame.
- A textinput element does not have a name available to an accessibility API. Valid names are: label element, title undefined, aria-label undefined, aria-labelledby undefined.
- A form field should be labelled in some way. Use the label element (either with a "for" attribute or wrapped around the form field), or "title", "aria-label" or "aria-labelledby" attributes as appropriate.
- A element has insufficient contrast at this conformance level. Expected a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, but text in this element has a contrast ratio of 3.71:1. Recommendation: change text colour to #006ee4.
- A textarea element does not have a name available to an accessibility API. Valid names are: label element, title undefined, aria-label undefined, aria-labelledby undefined.
Accessibility section:
- Number of types of issues: 8 3.40
- Number of issues: 22 2.80
##### Problems:
- Anchor element found with a valid href attribute, but no link content has been supplied.
- A emailinput element does not have a name available to an accessibility API. Valid names are: label element, title undefined, aria-label undefined, aria-labelledby undefined.
- A element has insufficient contrast at this conformance level. Expected a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, but text in this element has a contrast ratio of 3.9:1. Recommendation: change text colour to #767676.
- Iframe element requires a non-empty title attribute that identifies the frame.
- A textinput element does not have a name available to an accessibility API. Valid names are: label element, title undefined, aria-label undefined, aria-labelledby undefined.
- A form field should be labelled in some way. Use the label element (either with a "for" attribute or wrapped around the form field), or "title", "aria-label" or "aria-labelledby" attributes as appropriate.
- A element has insufficient contrast at this conformance level. Expected a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, but text in this element has a contrast ratio of 3.71:1. Recommendation: change text colour to #006ee4.
- A textarea element does not have a name available to an accessibility API. Valid names are: label element, title undefined, aria-label undefined, aria-labelledby undefined.
Integrity & Security
2.07
Results collected at 2024-10-16
- Rather poor on user privacy.
Security section:
- Insecure: HTTPS not used by default is pretty bad. 1.00
- Content Security Policy is pretty bad. 1.00
- Reporting CSP Certificate Transparency Network Error Logging is good! 5.00
- Referrer Policy is pretty bad. 1.00
- Subresource Integrity SRI is pretty bad. 1.00
- HTTP headers is ok, with 1 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 4.50
- Cookies is ok, with 12 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 1.00
Security section:
- Insecure: HTTPS not used by default is pretty bad. 1.00
- Content Security Policy is pretty bad. 1.00
- Reporting CSP Certificate Transparency Network Error Logging is good! 5.00
- Referrer Policy is pretty bad. 1.00
- Subresource Integrity SRI is pretty bad. 1.00
- HTTP headers is ok, with 1 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 4.50
- Cookies is ok, with 12 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 1.00
Energy Efficiency
2.45
Results collected at 2024-10-16
- The webpage generates more carbon dioxide than is preferable :/
- Carbon dioxide per pageview: 1.32 gram(s)
- More green than 49 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2024-03-31).
- More green than 47 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2022-12-16).
- Network transfer size: 2 mb 2.45
- Carbon dioxide per pageview: 1.32 gram(s)
- More green than 49 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2024-03-31).
- More green than 47 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2022-12-16).
- Network transfer size: 2 mb 2.45
Software
2.07
Results collected at 2024-10-16
- Technology used: js, sass, scss
- License(s) used: apache-2.0, mit
- Metadata used: icon, viewport
- Javascript libraries used: bootstrap, jquery, jquery-validation, jquery.ripples, js-cookie, modernizr, owlcarousel2, smtpjs.com
- Languages found: en
- Image formats used: ico, jpeg, jpg, png
Security section:
##### Software related to CVE:s 1.0
###### Introduction:
Software version used is affected by vulnerability described below.
In most cases you can fix a CVE related issue by updating software to latest version.
In some rare cases there is no update and you need to consider not using the software affected.
###### Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures
- CVE-2020-23064
- CVE-2020-11023
- CVE-2020-11022
- CVE-2019-5428
- CVE-2019-11358
- CVE-2024-6531
- CVE-2019-8331
###### Detected software(s):
- jquery 3.3.1
- bootstrap 4.2.1
###### Affected resource(s):
- http://www.ravindrarathore.com/
- https://www.ravindrarathore.com/js/jquery.min.js
- https://www.ravindrarathore.com/js/bootstrap.min.js
##### Software is behind >=25 versions 2.75
###### Introduction:
Software used is behind 25 or more version compared to latests.
This is a good indicator that you need to update to latest version.
It also indicate that you don't have a good package routine for your software.
You can fix this by updating software to latest version.
###### Detected software(s):
- modernizr 2.8.3
- bootstrap 4.2.1
###### Affected resource(s):
- http://www.ravindrarathore.com/
- https://www.ravindrarathore.com/js/bootstrap.min.js
##### Software is behind >=10 versions 3.0
###### Introduction:
Software used is behind 10 or more version compared to latests.
This is a semi good indicator that you need to update to latest version.
It also indicate that you don't have a good package routine for your software.
You can fix this by updating software to latest version.
###### Detected software(s):
- jquery 3.3.1
###### Affected resource(s):
- http://www.ravindrarathore.com/
- https://www.ravindrarathore.com/js/jquery.min.js
##### Opensource software used seem to be maintained 5.00
##### You don't seem to be using 'END OF LIFE' software 5.00
- License(s) used: apache-2.0, mit
- Metadata used: icon, viewport
- Javascript libraries used: bootstrap, jquery, jquery-validation, jquery.ripples, js-cookie, modernizr, owlcarousel2, smtpjs.com
- Languages found: en
- Image formats used: ico, jpeg, jpg, png
Security section:
##### Software related to CVE:s 1.0
###### Introduction:
Software version used is affected by vulnerability described below.
In most cases you can fix a CVE related issue by updating software to latest version.
In some rare cases there is no update and you need to consider not using the software affected.
###### Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures
- CVE-2020-23064
- CVE-2020-11023
- CVE-2020-11022
- CVE-2019-5428
- CVE-2019-11358
- CVE-2024-6531
- CVE-2019-8331
###### Detected software(s):
- jquery 3.3.1
- bootstrap 4.2.1
###### Affected resource(s):
- http://www.ravindrarathore.com/
- https://www.ravindrarathore.com/js/jquery.min.js
- https://www.ravindrarathore.com/js/bootstrap.min.js
##### Software is behind >=25 versions 2.75
###### Introduction:
Software used is behind 25 or more version compared to latests.
This is a good indicator that you need to update to latest version.
It also indicate that you don't have a good package routine for your software.
You can fix this by updating software to latest version.
###### Detected software(s):
- modernizr 2.8.3
- bootstrap 4.2.1
###### Affected resource(s):
- http://www.ravindrarathore.com/
- https://www.ravindrarathore.com/js/bootstrap.min.js
##### Software is behind >=10 versions 3.0
###### Introduction:
Software used is behind 10 or more version compared to latests.
This is a semi good indicator that you need to update to latest version.
It also indicate that you don't have a good package routine for your software.
You can fix this by updating software to latest version.
###### Detected software(s):
- jquery 3.3.1
###### Affected resource(s):
- http://www.ravindrarathore.com/
- https://www.ravindrarathore.com/js/jquery.min.js
##### Opensource software used seem to be maintained 5.00
##### You don't seem to be using 'END OF LIFE' software 5.00