ravindrarathore .com
3.49
Results collected 2024-03-15 from http://www.ravindrarathore.com/
Lighthouse Performance
2.90
- The website is quite slow.
- Total Blocking Time: 180 ms 4.60
- Largest Contentful Paint 1.00
- Cumulative Layout Shift 5.00
- Speed Index: 7.8 s 1.20
- First Contentful Paint: 3.7 s 1.45
- Avoid serving legacy JavaScript to modern browsers 1.00
- Defer offscreen images 1.00
- Efficiently encode images 1.00
- Eliminate render-blocking resources 1.00
- Largest Contentful Paint element 1.00
- Minify JavaScript 1.00
- Minimize main-thread work 1.00
- Preconnect to required origins 1.00
- Properly size images 1.00
- Reduce unused CSS 1.00
- Reduce unused JavaScript 1.00
- Serve images in next-gen formats 1.00
- Use HTTP/2 1.00
- Time to Interactive: 8.9 s 1.70
- Does not use passive listeners to improve scrolling performance: 2.50
- Ensure text remains visible during webfont load: 2.50
- Image elements do not have explicit
width
andheight
: 2.50 - Minify CSS: Potential savings of 4 KiB 2.50
- Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy: 25 resources found 2.50
- First Meaningful Paint: 3.7 s 2.85
- Max Potential First Input Delay: 120 ms 4.65
- Avoid chaining critical requests 5.00
- Avoid large layout shifts 5.00
- Avoid large layout shifts 5.00
- Avoid long main-thread tasks 5.00
- Avoid multiple page redirects 5.00
- Avoid non-composited animations 5.00
- Avoids
document.write()
5.00 - Avoids an excessive DOM size 5.00
- Avoids enormous network payloads 5.00
- Diagnostics 5.00
- Enable text compression 5.00
- Final Screenshot 5.00
- Has a
<meta name="viewport">
tag withwidth
orinitial-scale
5.00 - Initial server response time was short 5.00
- JavaScript execution time 5.00
- Metrics 5.00
- Minimize third-party usage 5.00
- Network Requests 5.00
- Network Round Trip Times 5.00
- Remove duplicate modules in JavaScript bundles 5.00
- Resources Summary 5.00
- Screenshot Thumbnails 5.00
- Script Treemap Data 5.00
- Server Backend Latencies 5.00
- Tasks 5.00
- Use video formats for animated content 5.00
- Enable text compression 5.00
Lighthouse SEO
5.00
- The website is really good at SEO!
- Document avoids plugins 5.00
- Document has a
<title>
element 5.00 - Document has a meta description 5.00
- Document has a valid
hreflang
5.00 - Document uses legible font sizes 5.00
- Has a
<meta name="viewport">
tag withwidth
orinitial-scale
5.00 - Image elements have
[alt]
attributes 5.00 - Links are crawlable 5.00
- Links have descriptive text 5.00
- Page has successful HTTP status code 5.00
- Page isn’t blocked from indexing 5.00
- Tap targets are sized appropriately 5.00
Lighthouse Best Practices
3.90
- About average on following good practice
- Does not use HTTPS 1.00
- Avoids deprecated APIs 5.00
- Avoids third-party cookies 5.00
- Serves images with low resolution 1.00
- Allows users to paste into input fields 5.00
- Avoids
unload
event listeners 5.00 - Avoids requesting the geolocation permission on page load 5.00
- Avoids requesting the notification permission on page load 5.00
- Displays images with correct aspect ratio 5.00
- No browser errors logged to the console 5.00
- No issues in the
Issues
panel in Chrome Devtools 5.00 - Page has the HTML doctype 5.00
- Properly defines charset 5.00
- Detected JavaScript libraries 5.00
- Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks 5.00
- Page has valid source maps 5.00
- Does not use HTTPS 1.00
- No issues in the
Issues
panel in Chrome Devtools 5.00 - Allows users to paste into input fields 5.00
- Avoids deprecated APIs 5.00
- Page has the HTML doctype 5.00
W3C HTML
4.85
- The tested page has 1 errors in its HTML code.
- Number of grouped error type: 1 4.80
- Number of errors: 1 4.90
- Attribute X not allowed on element X at this point. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
Standard Files
1.88
- robots.txt is missing, not allowed to download or has no expected content. 1.00
- Sitemap is not specified in robots.txt 1.00
- RSS subscription is missing in the HTMLs metadata. 4.50
- security.txt is missing. 1.00
Lighthouse A11y
4.35
- The website can be more accessible, but is rather good!
- ARIA
progressbar
elements do not have accessible names. 1.00 - Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio. 1.00
- Links do not have a discernible name 1.00
- Buttons have an accessible name 5.00
- Image elements have
[alt]
attributes 5.00 [aria-*]
attributes are valid and not misspelled 5.00[aria-*]
attributes have valid values 5.00[aria-*]
attributes match their roles 5.00[aria-hidden="true"]
is not present on the document<body>
5.00[role]
s have all required[aria-*]
attributes 5.00[user-scalable="no"]
is not used in the<meta name="viewport">
element and the[maximum-scale]
attribute is not less than 5. 5.00- Document has a
<title>
element 5.00 - List items (
<li>
) are contained within<ul>
,<ol>
or<menu>
parent elements 5.00 - Lists contain only
<li>
elements and script supporting elements (<script>
and<template>
). 5.00 <frame>
or<iframe>
elements have a title 5.00<html>
element has a[lang]
attribute 5.00<html>
element has a valid value for its[lang]
attribute 5.00[aria-hidden="true"]
elements do not contain focusable descendents 5.00[role]
values are valid 5.00- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order 5.00
- Image elements do not have
[alt]
attributes that are redundant text. 5.00 - Values assigned to
role=""
are valid ARIA roles. 5.00 - Document has a main landmark. 5.00
Sitespeed.io
3.99
- About average speed. 3.99
- Speedindex: 1510 3.99
- Loading time: 0.617 sec
- Number of requests: 48
Yellow Lab Tools
4.05
- The website has good frontend code. 4.05
- Page weight 3.60
- Requests 4.75
- DOM complexity 5.00
- JS complexity 4.70
- Bad JS 5.00
- jQuery 5.00
- CSS complexity 2.55
- Bad CSS 2.60
- Web fonts 1.25
- Server config 3.50
- Number of iframes 5.00
- Total JS execution time 4.85
- DOM access 5.00
- Scroll events bound 3.55
- document.write calls 5.00
- Synchronous Ajax requests 5.00
- Rules count 3.80
- Total weight 3.95
- Image optimization 1.80
- Oversized images 5.00
- Gzip/Brotli compression 4.60
- File minification 2.70
- Requests number 5.00
- Different domains 5.00
- 404 not found 5.00
- Connections closed 5.00
- Identical content 5.00
- Below the fold images 3.20
- Webfonts number 1.00
- Overweighted webfonts 2.90
- WOFF 2 4.95
- HTTP protocols 1.00
- TLS protocols 5.00
- Caching disabled 5.00
- Caching not specified 5.00
- Caching too short 1.00
- jQuery version 5.00
- TLS protocols 5.00
- IDs duplicated 5.00
- CSS syntax error 5.00
- Gzip/Brotli compression 4.60
- 404 not found 5.00
- TLS protocols 5.00
Pa11y
3.10
- The accessibility is apparently really bad! Probably both for disabled people and everyone of us when we need some accessibility!
- Number of error type: 8 3.40
- Number of errors: 22 2.80
Problems:
- Anchor element found with a valid href attribute, but no link content has been supplied.
- A emailinput element does not have a name available to an accessibility API. Valid names are: label element, title undefined, aria-label undefined, aria-labelledby undefined.
- Iframe element requires a non-empty title attribute that identifies the frame.
- A element has insufficient contrast at this conformance level. Expected a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, but text in this element has a contrast ratio of 3.71:1. Recommendation: change text colour to #006ee4.
- A textarea element does not have a name available to an accessibility API. Valid names are: label element, title undefined, aria-label undefined, aria-labelledby undefined.
- A element has insufficient contrast at this conformance level. Expected a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, but text in this element has a contrast ratio of 3.9:1. Recommendation: change text colour to #767676.
- A form field should be labelled in some way. Use the label element (either with a "for" attribute or wrapped around the form field), or "title", "aria-label" or "aria-labelledby" attributes as appropriate.
- A textinput element does not have a name available to an accessibility API. Valid names are: label element, title undefined, aria-label undefined, aria-labelledby undefined.
Integrity & Security
2.07
- Rather poor on user privacy.
- Result generated: 2024-03-15 16:01:05 Etc/UTC (Cached for 24 hours)
- Insecure: HTTPS not used by default: is pretty bad. 1.00
- Content Security Policy: is pretty bad. 1.00
- Reporting CSP Certificate Transparency Network Error Logging: is good! 5.00
- Referrer Policy: is pretty bad. 1.00
- Subresource Integrity SRI: is pretty bad. 1.00
- HTTP headers: is ok, with 1 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 4.50
- Cookies: is ok, with 12 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 1.00
HTTP & Tech
3.11
- Score is divided by 2 (number of urls tested with redirects)
- No HTTP to HTTPS redirect 1.00
- TLSv1.3 support but wrong certificate 2.50
- TLSv1.2 support but wrong certificate 2.50
- IPv6 support 5.00
- IPv4 support 5.00
- No HTTPv3 support 1.00
- No QUIC support 1.00
- No HTTP to HTTPS redirect 1.00
- TLSv1.3 support but wrong certificate 2.50
- TLSv1.2 support but wrong certificate 2.50
- IPv6 support 5.00
- IPv4 support 5.00
- No HTTPv3 support 1.00
- No QUIC support 1.00
Carbon Calculator
2.70
- Average regarding carbon dioxide.
- Carbon dioxide per pageview: 1.14 gram(s)
- More green than 54 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2022-12-16).
- More green than 55 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2021-12-12).
- Network transfer size: 2 mb 2.70