support .optimizely .com/ hc/ en-us
3.91
Results from https://support.optimizely.com/hc/en-us
Lighthouse Performance
2.55
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- The website is quite slow.
Performance section:
- Total Blocking Time: 690 ms 2.15
- Largest Contentful Paint: 8.2 s 1.00
- Cumulative Layout Shift 5.00
- First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s 2.15
- Speed Index: 3.9 s 4.15
- Time to Interactive: 11.3 s 1.00
- Minimize main-thread work 1.00
- Reduce JavaScript execution time 1.00
- Reduce the impact of third-party code 1.00
- Largest Contentful Paint element 1.00
- Eliminate render-blocking resources 1.00
- Reduce unused CSS 1.00
- Reduce unused JavaScript 1.00
- Serve images in next-gen formats 1.00
- Efficiently encode images 1.00
- Properly size images 1.00
- Image elements do not have explicit `width` and `height`: 2.50
- Preload Largest Contentful Paint image: 2.50
- Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy: 33 resources found 2.50
- Minify CSS: Potential savings of 14 KiB 2.50
- Avoid serving legacy JavaScript to modern browsers: Potential savings of 14 KiB 2.50
- Max Potential First Input Delay: 230 ms 2.75
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- Screenshot Thumbnails 5.00
- Final Screenshot 5.00
- Initial server response time was short 5.00
- Avoid chaining critical requests 5.00
- Avoid multiple page redirects 5.00
- Preconnect to required origins 5.00
- All text remains visible during webfont loads 5.00
- Diagnostics 5.00
- Network Requests 5.00
- Network Round Trip Times 5.00
- Server Backend Latencies 5.00
- Tasks 5.00
- Metrics 5.00
- Resources Summary 5.00
- Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded 5.00
- Avoid long main-thread tasks 5.00
- Avoid non-composited animations 5.00
- Script Treemap Data 5.00
- Avoids enormous network payloads 5.00
- Defer offscreen images 5.00
- Minify JavaScript 5.00
- Enable text compression 5.00
- Use video formats for animated content 5.00
- Remove duplicate modules in JavaScript bundles 5.00
- Avoids an excessive DOM size 5.00
- Avoids `document.write()` 5.00
- Use HTTP/2 5.00
- Uses passive listeners to improve scrolling performance 5.00
- Page didn't prevent back/forward cache restoration 5.00
Performance section:
- Total Blocking Time: 690 ms 2.15
- Largest Contentful Paint: 8.2 s 1.00
- Cumulative Layout Shift 5.00
- First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s 2.15
- Speed Index: 3.9 s 4.15
- Time to Interactive: 11.3 s 1.00
- Minimize main-thread work 1.00
- Reduce JavaScript execution time 1.00
- Reduce the impact of third-party code 1.00
- Largest Contentful Paint element 1.00
- Eliminate render-blocking resources 1.00
- Reduce unused CSS 1.00
- Reduce unused JavaScript 1.00
- Serve images in next-gen formats 1.00
- Efficiently encode images 1.00
- Properly size images 1.00
- Image elements do not have explicit `width` and `height`: 2.50
- Preload Largest Contentful Paint image: 2.50
- Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy: 33 resources found 2.50
- Minify CSS: Potential savings of 14 KiB 2.50
- Avoid serving legacy JavaScript to modern browsers: Potential savings of 14 KiB 2.50
- Max Potential First Input Delay: 230 ms 2.75
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- Screenshot Thumbnails 5.00
- Final Screenshot 5.00
- Initial server response time was short 5.00
- Avoid chaining critical requests 5.00
- Avoid multiple page redirects 5.00
- Preconnect to required origins 5.00
- All text remains visible during webfont loads 5.00
- Diagnostics 5.00
- Network Requests 5.00
- Network Round Trip Times 5.00
- Server Backend Latencies 5.00
- Tasks 5.00
- Metrics 5.00
- Resources Summary 5.00
- Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded 5.00
- Avoid long main-thread tasks 5.00
- Avoid non-composited animations 5.00
- Script Treemap Data 5.00
- Avoids enormous network payloads 5.00
- Defer offscreen images 5.00
- Minify JavaScript 5.00
- Enable text compression 5.00
- Use video formats for animated content 5.00
- Remove duplicate modules in JavaScript bundles 5.00
- Avoids an excessive DOM size 5.00
- Avoids `document.write()` 5.00
- Use HTTP/2 5.00
- Uses passive listeners to improve scrolling performance 5.00
- Page didn't prevent back/forward cache restoration 5.00
404 Page
2.60
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- Correct status code? Got 403, and 404 is correct. 1.00
- Found a page title in the page's metadata? 5.00
- Found headline (h1)? 1.00
- Is it lacking text describing that an error has occurred (in Swedish OR English for English sites)? 5.00
- Is text content length is less than 150 characters, which indicates that the user is not being referred, nor advised? 1.00
- Found a page title in the page's metadata? 5.00
- Found headline (h1)? 1.00
- Is it lacking text describing that an error has occurred (in Swedish OR English for English sites)? 5.00
- Is text content length is less than 150 characters, which indicates that the user is not being referred, nor advised? 1.00
Lighthouse SEO
4.60
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- Pretty good at SEO, but still has some potential improvements.
- Document does not have a meta description 1.00
- Page isn’t blocked from indexing 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- Image elements have `[alt]` attributes 5.00
- Page has successful HTTP status code 5.00
- Links have descriptive text 5.00
- Links are crawlable 5.00
- robots.txt is valid 5.00
- Document has a valid `hreflang` 5.00
- Document has a valid `rel=canonical` 5.00
- Document does not have a meta description 1.00
- Page isn’t blocked from indexing 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- Image elements have `[alt]` attributes 5.00
- Page has successful HTTP status code 5.00
- Links have descriptive text 5.00
- Links are crawlable 5.00
- robots.txt is valid 5.00
- Document has a valid `hreflang` 5.00
- Document has a valid `rel=canonical` 5.00
Lighthouse Best Practices
3.05
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- About average on following best practice
- Uses deprecated APIs 1.00
- Uses third-party cookies 1.00
- Uses HTTPS 5.00
- Issues were logged in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools 1.00
- Allows users to paste into input fields 5.00
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- No browser errors logged to the console 5.00
- Displays images with correct aspect ratio 5.00
- Serves images with appropriate resolution 5.00
- Page has the HTML doctype 5.00
- Properly defines charset 5.00
- Avoids requesting the geolocation permission on page load 5.00
- Avoids requesting the notification permission on page load 5.00
- Document uses legible font sizes 5.00
- Page has valid source maps 5.00
- Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks 5.00
- Detected JavaScript libraries 5.00
- Uses deprecated APIs 1.00
- Uses third-party cookies 1.00
- Uses HTTPS 5.00
- Issues were logged in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools 1.00
- Allows users to paste into input fields 5.00
- Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale` 5.00
- No browser errors logged to the console 5.00
- Displays images with correct aspect ratio 5.00
- Serves images with appropriate resolution 5.00
- Page has the HTML doctype 5.00
- Properly defines charset 5.00
- Avoids requesting the geolocation permission on page load 5.00
- Avoids requesting the notification permission on page load 5.00
- Document uses legible font sizes 5.00
- Page has valid source maps 5.00
- Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks 5.00
- Detected JavaScript libraries 5.00
W3C HTML
4.96
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- The tested page has 3 errors in its HTML code.
Standards section:
- #1: en-us- Number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- #1: en-us- Number of errors: 0 5.00
- #4: favicon.ico- Number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- #4: favicon.ico- Number of errors: 0 5.00
- #6: auto- Number of grouped error type: 1 4.80
- #6: auto- Number of errors: 1 4.90
- A “meta” element with an “http-equiv” attribute whose value is “X-UA-Compatible” must have a “content” attribute with the value “IE=edge”. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- #7: favicon.ico- Number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- #7: favicon.ico- Number of errors: 0 5.00
Standards section:
- #1: en-us- Number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- #1: en-us- Number of errors: 0 5.00
- #4: favicon.ico- Number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- #4: favicon.ico- Number of errors: 0 5.00
- #6: auto- Number of grouped error type: 1 4.80
- #6: auto- Number of errors: 1 4.90
- A “meta” element with an “http-equiv” attribute whose value is “X-UA-Compatible” must have a “content” attribute with the value “IE=edge”. (errors of this type: 1 pcs)
- #7: favicon.ico- Number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- #7: favicon.ico- Number of errors: 0 5.00
W3C CSS
4.97
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- The CSS is very good.
Standards section:
- `<style>` in: #1: en-us, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `<style>` in: #1: en-us, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `<style>` in: #4: favicon.ico, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `<style>` in: #4: favicon.ico, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `<style>` in: #6: auto, number of grouped error type: 1 4.80
- `<style>` in: #6: auto, number of errors: 2 4.80
- CSS: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- `<style>` in: #7: favicon.ico, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `<style>` in: #7: favicon.ico, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `style=""`, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `style=""`, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `<link rel="stylesheet">`, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `<link rel="stylesheet">`, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"`, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"`, number of errors: 0 5.00
Standards section:
- `<style>` in: #1: en-us, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `<style>` in: #1: en-us, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `<style>` in: #4: favicon.ico, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `<style>` in: #4: favicon.ico, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `<style>` in: #6: auto, number of grouped error type: 1 4.80
- `<style>` in: #6: auto, number of errors: 2 4.80
- CSS: Parse Error. (number of errors of this type: 2)
- `<style>` in: #7: favicon.ico, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `<style>` in: #7: favicon.ico, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `style=""`, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `style=""`, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `<link rel="stylesheet">`, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `<link rel="stylesheet">`, number of errors: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"`, number of grouped error type: 0 5.00
- `content-type=".*css.*"`, number of errors: 0 5.00
Standard Files
3.88
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- RSS subscription is missing in the HTML's metadata. 4.50
Standards section:
- robots.txt seems ok. 5.00
- Sitemap, Url in <loc> is starting with https:// 5.00
- Sitemap, Url in <loc> is using same domain as robots.txt 5.00
- Sitemap, No duplicate Urls in <loc> 5.00
- Sitemap, is only listing webpages 5.00
- Sitemap(s) are only specified once 5.00
- Sitemap, is under 50 000 items 5.00
- The Sitemap is neither good or bad. 5.00
- security.txt has incorrect content. 1.00
Standards section:
- robots.txt seems ok. 5.00
- Sitemap, Url in <loc> is starting with https:// 5.00
- Sitemap, Url in <loc> is using same domain as robots.txt 5.00
- Sitemap, No duplicate Urls in <loc> 5.00
- Sitemap, is only listing webpages 5.00
- Sitemap(s) are only specified once 5.00
- Sitemap, is under 50 000 items 5.00
- The Sitemap is neither good or bad. 5.00
- security.txt has incorrect content. 1.00
Lighthouse A11y
4.65
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- The website can be more accessible, but is rather good!
Accessibility section:
- Some elements have a `[tabindex]` value greater than 0 1.00
- Touch targets do not have sufficient size or spacing. 1.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes match their roles 5.00
- `[aria-hidden="true"]` is not present on the document `<body>` 5.00
- `[role]`s have all required `[aria-*]` attributes 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes have valid values 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes are valid and not misspelled 5.00
- Buttons have an accessible name 5.00
- Image elements have `[alt]` attributes 5.00
- `[user-scalable="no"]` is not used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element and the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is not less than 5. 5.00
- ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role 5.00
- `[aria-hidden="true"]` elements do not contain focusable descendents 5.00
- Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes 5.00
- `[role]` values are valid 5.00
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- `<frame>` or `<iframe>` elements have a title 5.00
- `<html>` element has a `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- `<html>` element has a valid value for its `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- Form elements have associated labels 5.00
- Links have a discernible name 5.00
- Lists contain only `<li>` elements and script supporting elements (`<script>` and `<template>`). 5.00
- List items (`<li>`) are contained within `<ul>`, `<ol>` or `<menu>` parent elements 5.00
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order 5.00
- Uses ARIA roles only on compatible elements 5.00
- Deprecated ARIA roles were not used 5.00
- Image elements do not have `[alt]` attributes that are redundant text. 5.00
- Identical links have the same purpose. 5.00
Accessibility section:
- Some elements have a `[tabindex]` value greater than 0 1.00
- Touch targets do not have sufficient size or spacing. 1.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes match their roles 5.00
- `[aria-hidden="true"]` is not present on the document `<body>` 5.00
- `[role]`s have all required `[aria-*]` attributes 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes have valid values 5.00
- `[aria-*]` attributes are valid and not misspelled 5.00
- Buttons have an accessible name 5.00
- Image elements have `[alt]` attributes 5.00
- `[user-scalable="no"]` is not used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element and the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is not less than 5. 5.00
- ARIA attributes are used as specified for the element's role 5.00
- `[aria-hidden="true"]` elements do not contain focusable descendents 5.00
- Elements use only permitted ARIA attributes 5.00
- `[role]` values are valid 5.00
- Background and foreground colors have a sufficient contrast ratio 5.00
- Document has a `<title>` element 5.00
- `<frame>` or `<iframe>` elements have a title 5.00
- `<html>` element has a `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- `<html>` element has a valid value for its `[lang]` attribute 5.00
- Form elements have associated labels 5.00
- Links have a discernible name 5.00
- Lists contain only `<li>` elements and script supporting elements (`<script>` and `<template>`). 5.00
- List items (`<li>`) are contained within `<ul>`, `<ol>` or `<menu>` parent elements 5.00
- Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order 5.00
- Uses ARIA roles only on compatible elements 5.00
- Deprecated ARIA roles were not used 5.00
- Image elements do not have `[alt]` attributes that are redundant text. 5.00
- Identical links have the same purpose. 5.00
Sitespeed.io
4.41
Results collected at 2024-11-13
Performance section:
- [desktop] TTFB (Time to First Byte): 149.00ms, ±7.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] DOMContentLoaded: 1063.33ms, ±6.67ms 3.87
- [desktop] FCP (First Contentful Paint): 1060.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): 1183.33ms, ±16.67ms 1.00
- [desktop] Load: 1743.33ms, ±6.67ms 2.51
- [desktop] TBT (Total Blocking Time): 40.00ms, ±30.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] FirstVisualChange: 1070.00ms, ±0.00ms 3.86
- [desktop] SpeedIndex: 1135.00ms, ±5.00ms 3.73
- [desktop] VisualComplete85: 1190.00ms, ±20.00ms 3.62
- [desktop] firstPaint: 792.67ms, ±7.33ms
- [desktop] LastVisualChange: 1695.00ms, ±15.00ms
- [mobile] TTFB (Time to First Byte): 146.00ms, ±17.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] DOMContentLoaded: 1043.33ms, ±16.67ms 5.00
- [mobile] FCP (First Contentful Paint): 1030.00ms, ±10.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): 1133.33ms, ±66.67ms 5.00
- [mobile] Load: 1740.00ms, ±10.00ms 4.52
- [mobile] TBT (Total Blocking Time): 7.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] FirstVisualChange: 1015.00ms, ±15.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] SpeedIndex: 1245.00ms, ±195.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] VisualComplete85: 1135.00ms, ±65.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] firstPaint: 766.67ms, ±16.33ms
- [mobile] LastVisualChange: 4220.00ms, ±2980.00ms
- [desktop] TTFB (Time to First Byte): 149.00ms, ±7.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] DOMContentLoaded: 1063.33ms, ±6.67ms 3.87
- [desktop] FCP (First Contentful Paint): 1060.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): 1183.33ms, ±16.67ms 1.00
- [desktop] Load: 1743.33ms, ±6.67ms 2.51
- [desktop] TBT (Total Blocking Time): 40.00ms, ±30.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [desktop] FirstVisualChange: 1070.00ms, ±0.00ms 3.86
- [desktop] SpeedIndex: 1135.00ms, ±5.00ms 3.73
- [desktop] VisualComplete85: 1190.00ms, ±20.00ms 3.62
- [desktop] firstPaint: 792.67ms, ±7.33ms
- [desktop] LastVisualChange: 1695.00ms, ±15.00ms
- [mobile] TTFB (Time to First Byte): 146.00ms, ±17.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] DOMContentLoaded: 1043.33ms, ±16.67ms 5.00
- [mobile] FCP (First Contentful Paint): 1030.00ms, ±10.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] LCP (Largest Contentful Paint): 1133.33ms, ±66.67ms 5.00
- [mobile] Load: 1740.00ms, ±10.00ms 4.52
- [mobile] TBT (Total Blocking Time): 7.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift): 0.00ms, ±0.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] FirstVisualChange: 1015.00ms, ±15.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] SpeedIndex: 1245.00ms, ±195.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] VisualComplete85: 1135.00ms, ±65.00ms 5.00
- [mobile] firstPaint: 766.67ms, ±16.33ms
- [mobile] LastVisualChange: 4220.00ms, ±2980.00ms
Yellow Lab Tools
4.35
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- The website has rather good frontend code. 4.35
- Network 4.75
- Images 3.35
- DOM complexity 4.85
- JS complexity 4.90
- Bad JS 4.95
- jQuery 5.00
- CSS complexity 1.75
- Bad CSS 3.10
- Web fonts 5.00
- Server config 4.45
Performance section:
- Number of iframes 5.00
- Total JS execution time 5.00
- DOM access 5.00
- Scroll events bound 4.30
- document.write calls 5.00
- Synchronous Ajax requests 5.00
- Rules count 1.00
- Total weight 5.00
- Gzip/Brotli compression 4.25
- File minification 3.35
- Requests number 5.00
- Different domains 4.70
- 404 not found 5.00
- Connections closed 5.00
- Identical content 5.00
- Below the fold images 1.35
- Webfonts number 5.00
- Overweighted webfonts 5.00
- WOFF 2 5.00
- HTTP protocols 5.00
- TLS protocols 5.00
- Caching disabled 5.00
- Caching not specified 5.00
- Caching too short 1.00
- Network 4.75
- Images 3.35
- DOM complexity 4.85
- JS complexity 4.90
- Bad JS 4.95
- jQuery 5.00
- CSS complexity 1.75
- Bad CSS 3.10
- Web fonts 5.00
- Server config 4.45
Performance section:
- Number of iframes 5.00
- Total JS execution time 5.00
- DOM access 5.00
- Scroll events bound 4.30
- document.write calls 5.00
- Synchronous Ajax requests 5.00
- Rules count 1.00
- Total weight 5.00
- Gzip/Brotli compression 4.25
- File minification 3.35
- Requests number 5.00
- Different domains 4.70
- 404 not found 5.00
- Connections closed 5.00
- Identical content 5.00
- Below the fold images 1.35
- Webfonts number 5.00
- Overweighted webfonts 5.00
- WOFF 2 5.00
- HTTP protocols 5.00
- TLS protocols 5.00
- Caching disabled 5.00
- Caching not specified 5.00
- Caching too short 1.00
Pa11y
3.65
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- The accessibility is really bad! Probably both for disabled people and everyone of us when we need some accessibility!
Accessibility section:
- Number of types of issues: 7 3.60
- Number of issues: 13 3.70
##### Problems:
- Duplicate id attribute value "searchWidgetTrigger" found on the web page.
- A form field should be labelled in some way. Use the label element (either with a "for" attribute or wrapped around the form field), or "title", "aria-label" or "aria-labelledby" attributes as appropriate.
- A form does not contain a submit button, which creates issues for those who cannot submit the form using the keyboard. Submit buttons are INPUT elements with type attribute "submit" or "image", or BUTTON elements with type "submit" or omitted/invalid.
- A textinput element does not have a name available to an accessibility API. Valid names are: label element, title undefined, aria-label undefined, aria-labelledby undefined.
- Iframe element requires a non-empty title attribute that identifies the frame.
- A textarea element does not have a name available to an accessibility API. Valid names are: label element, title undefined, aria-label undefined, aria-labelledby undefined.
- Duplicate id attribute value "query" found on the web page.
Accessibility section:
- Number of types of issues: 7 3.60
- Number of issues: 13 3.70
##### Problems:
- Duplicate id attribute value "searchWidgetTrigger" found on the web page.
- A form field should be labelled in some way. Use the label element (either with a "for" attribute or wrapped around the form field), or "title", "aria-label" or "aria-labelledby" attributes as appropriate.
- A form does not contain a submit button, which creates issues for those who cannot submit the form using the keyboard. Submit buttons are INPUT elements with type attribute "submit" or "image", or BUTTON elements with type "submit" or omitted/invalid.
- A textinput element does not have a name available to an accessibility API. Valid names are: label element, title undefined, aria-label undefined, aria-labelledby undefined.
- Iframe element requires a non-empty title attribute that identifies the frame.
- A textarea element does not have a name available to an accessibility API. Valid names are: label element, title undefined, aria-label undefined, aria-labelledby undefined.
- Duplicate id attribute value "query" found on the web page.
Integrity & Security
2.78
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- Rather poor on user privacy.
Security section:
- HTTPS by default is good! 5.00
- HTTP Strict Transport Security HSTS is good, but with 1 warning(s). 4.75
- Content Security Policy is pretty bad. 1.00
- Reporting CSP Certificate Transparency Network Error Logging is not that good. 2.50
- Referrer Policy is not that good. 2.50
- Subresource Integrity SRI is pretty bad. 1.00
- HTTP headers is ok, with 1 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 4.50
- Cookies is ok, with 9 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 1.00
Security section:
- HTTPS by default is good! 5.00
- HTTP Strict Transport Security HSTS is good, but with 1 warning(s). 4.75
- Content Security Policy is pretty bad. 1.00
- Reporting CSP Certificate Transparency Network Error Logging is not that good. 2.50
- Referrer Policy is not that good. 2.50
- Subresource Integrity SRI is pretty bad. 1.00
- HTTP headers is ok, with 1 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 4.50
- Cookies is ok, with 9 error(s) and 0 warning(s). 1.00
Energy Efficiency
3.25
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- Average regarding carbon dioxide.
- Carbon dioxide per pageview: 0.92 gram(s)
- More green than 65 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2024-03-31).
- More green than 63 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2022-12-16).
- Network transfer size: 1 mb 3.25
- Carbon dioxide per pageview: 0.92 gram(s)
- More green than 65 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2024-03-31).
- More green than 63 % of the websites tested by webperf.se (Reference updated: 2022-12-16).
- Network transfer size: 1 mb 3.25
Software
5.00
Results collected at 2024-11-13
- Metadata used: preload, viewport
- Languages found: en-us
- Image formats used: ico, png
Security section:
##### NO Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures found 5.00
##### You seem to be up to date for all software we can identify 5.00
##### Opensource software used seem to be maintained 5.00
##### You don't seem to be using 'END OF LIFE' software 5.00
- Languages found: en-us
- Image formats used: ico, png
Security section:
##### NO Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures found 5.00
##### You seem to be up to date for all software we can identify 5.00
##### Opensource software used seem to be maintained 5.00
##### You don't seem to be using 'END OF LIFE' software 5.00